Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Nuclear Unicorn

(19,497 posts)
18. I don't think that's not a prosecutable offense.
Mon Jul 1, 2013, 04:15 PM
Jul 2013
telling TM that he didn't have a problem was clear evidence that GZ was HIDING SOMETHING. If I'm Trayvon, I'm much more concerned now than I was before.


Declining to identify as neighborhood watch would not excuse a violent confrontation.
I'm confused. So if someone says there is not a problem virgogal Jul 2013 #1
Rather than saying "I am neighborhood watch" he basically said he was following for some other uppityperson Jul 2013 #7
ESPECIALLY if that person is armed, right??? Duer 157099 Jul 2013 #41
THANK YOU Skittles Jul 2013 #51
Did Martin know Jenoch Jul 2013 #54
Unfortunately, we may never know. Only one that will tell us was shot dead. Dawgs Jul 2013 #55
Zimmerman needed to identify himself as a Jenoch Jul 2013 #67
That makes sense. I'm still baffled by the fact that Zimmerman did not identify himself. Liberal_Stalwart71 Jul 2013 #90
As I have stated before, Jenoch Jul 2013 #95
No, it sounds like what you're describing is the Stand Your Ground law, not a self defense Liberal_Stalwart71 Jul 2013 #102
I was not describing stand your ground law. Jenoch Jul 2013 #107
Under the FL statutes it doesn't matter who started it. reusrename Jul 2013 #115
That's interesting. Jenoch Jul 2013 #118
Why didn't Zimmerman Identify Himself? blkrjoe Jul 2013 #142
Indeed!! These are questions that the Zimmerman Cheerleaders refuse to answer. Why? Liberal_Stalwart71 Jul 2013 #143
"He might not have participated in any altercation had he known" .. "Zimmerman was armed." Dawgs Jul 2013 #120
Zimmerman had prepared by becoming "armed and dangerous." reusrename Jul 2013 #114
Wow. I'm trying to deal with the facts Jenoch Jul 2013 #117
I know, the facts are pretty damning. reusrename Jul 2013 #128
I am unaware of any evidence Jenoch Jul 2013 #131
What other motive is there? reusrename Jul 2013 #132
I think it is more likely Jenoch Jul 2013 #134
Wtf? If he was afraid of him, why did he follow him? reusrename Jul 2013 #135
Watch the trial. Jenoch Jul 2013 #137
I'm terrified that kid is going to kill me, let me follow him. reusrename Jul 2013 #138
Why would I think he had a fantasy about killing someone? Jenoch Jul 2013 #139
It is called the process of elimination. reusrename Jul 2013 #140
You're right, there is NO other explanation for his actions. Jenoch Jul 2013 #141
I'm saying that when TM asked GZ, essentially, why he was following him, GZ denied it Duer 157099 Jul 2013 #10
I think you make an excellent point. crim son Jul 2013 #36
Neighborhood Watch liberal from boston Jul 2013 #44
and he was supposed to recruit others and assign each block a captain and never did either... bettyellen Jul 2013 #74
I certainly agree with you in this instance. I was referring virgogal Jul 2013 #83
Well, it can be somewhat generalized Duer 157099 Jul 2013 #84
yes you are confused demwing Jul 2013 #127
i'm still trying to understand how GZ unholsters his firearm.. frylock Jul 2013 #2
Me too. brush Jul 2013 #12
About the 'head bashing' . . . fleur-de-lisa Jul 2013 #21
Except zimmerman claims Martin was brush Jul 2013 #22
Oh, I agree completely that GZ is a liar. fleur-de-lisa Jul 2013 #24
Yes, and he would have a concussion, possible skull fracture . . . brush Jul 2013 #32
His wounds don't support the repeated bashing senario notadmblnd Jul 2013 #78
Neither does the alleged broken nose. No offensive wounds on Trayvon's hands or knuckles. NONE! Liberal_Stalwart71 Jul 2013 #94
Huh? Jenoch Jul 2013 #108
You need to slow down and re-read what I wrote notadmblnd Jul 2013 #119
Hey nota . . . fleur-de-lisa Jul 2013 #123
That injury could not be from recoil of Zimmerman's pistol. drhobo Jul 2013 #72
We all know who started the confrontation. It was Zimmerman. He admits that he continued to Liberal_Stalwart71 Jul 2013 #96
O.K., so let's accept for a minute that Trayvon did bash Zimmerman's head.. Liberal_Stalwart71 Jul 2013 #93
The physician's assistant testified that Zimmerman was already seeing a shrink kskiska Jul 2013 #52
Zimmerman was fired from a job as a bouncer because he was too violent. yardwork Jul 2013 #82
History of violence: (1) domestic abuse charge and (2) striking a police officer charge. Liberal_Stalwart71 Jul 2013 #97
Apparently the same way he was able to alsame Jul 2013 #27
simply amazing, isn't it? frylock Jul 2013 #31
I hope the jury picks up on alsame Jul 2013 #34
Only happens if prosecutor introduces them as evidence. HooptieWagon Jul 2013 #56
and reaching for the gun all at the same time. louis-t Jul 2013 #57
was just thinking about that, and per GZ's account, Martin must've had 6 arms.. frylock Jul 2013 #64
Yeah, he had to be a Budda. brush Jul 2013 #103
Not Buddha--he had just two arms. tblue37 Jul 2013 #116
Good catch. Agreed. nt brush Jul 2013 #124
Personally, I think he had his gun out the entire time he was stalking his victim. notadmblnd Jul 2013 #77
I absolutely believe the gun was already out TorchTheWitch Jul 2013 #98
ANd shot Martin straight through the torso, hitting the heart dead on csziggy Jul 2013 #111
no kidding. dionysus Jul 2013 #126
He had a few instances where he could have diffused the situation Xyzse Jul 2013 #3
You're joking, right? nt Honeycombe8 Jul 2013 #4
The "fry Zimmerman" crowd have checked out Azathoth Jul 2013 #6
Unlike the "zimmy defender" crowd? Is insulting others who have a different opinion really helpful? uppityperson Jul 2013 #9
Different opinions? Sure. But that's not a license to say ridiculous things Azathoth Jul 2013 #11
Oh there are enough Zimmy defenders posting ridiculous things also. uppityperson Jul 2013 #14
how did you feel about OJ? noiretextatique Jul 2013 #13
lol, I think you've got it mixed up Azathoth Jul 2013 #20
What makes you say that? I am curious. uppityperson Jul 2013 #25
What makes you curious? Azathoth Jul 2013 #26
Because I don't see that and wondering why you do. Why do you? uppityperson Jul 2013 #28
Maybe we know different people Azathoth Jul 2013 #29
Why do you say "A lot of the 'fry Zimmerman' folk were the ones chanting 'free OJ' back in the day"? uppityperson Jul 2013 #30
Am I wrong? Did you want OJ convicted? n/t Azathoth Jul 2013 #33
You are not going to answer my previous question. Got it. Thanks for playing. Again. uppityperson Jul 2013 #35
lol, interesting that you wouldn't take the opportunity to prove me wrong Azathoth Jul 2013 #40
lol, interesting that you won't answer a direct question but continue to dodge. uppityperson Jul 2013 #59
that one heaven05 Jul 2013 #65
Hmmm....I don't seem to recall you asking me a straightforward question Azathoth Jul 2013 #86
I didn't heaven05 Jul 2013 #122
What specifically leads you to believe that? LanternWaste Jul 2013 #37
What is the implied correlation? Azathoth Jul 2013 #43
Why do you say this? There's absolutely no correlation. Why would you say something like this? Liberal_Stalwart71 Jul 2013 #49
i think we all know the reason JI7 Jul 2013 #61
He wrote that he knew people Jenoch Jul 2013 #71
He shouldn't accuse others of the same just because he knows people who supported OJ. It's unfair. Liberal_Stalwart71 Jul 2013 #87
I'm just reading what he wrote. Jenoch Jul 2013 #91
No, I'm offended because he seems to imply race in the two cases. I believe OJ was guilty as hell. Liberal_Stalwart71 Jul 2013 #100
I don't know this guy. Jenoch Jul 2013 #109
There's a double standard Azathoth Jul 2013 #112
Everyone I knew wanted him to be found guilty. Jenoch Jul 2013 #113
What are you talking about? Azathoth Jul 2013 #85
The relationship should not have been made and whoever made it is really sick. One argument Liberal_Stalwart71 Jul 2013 #89
And once again Azathoth Jul 2013 #92
I answered your question below. Yes, I think OJ is guilty. Yes, I also think Zimmerman is guilty. Liberal_Stalwart71 Jul 2013 #101
lol, see ya Azathoth Jul 2013 #104
No n/t Duer 157099 Jul 2013 #8
+1 blue_heron Jul 2013 #5
zimmerman is banking on racism noiretextatique Jul 2013 #15
Of course he is Duer 157099 Jul 2013 #16
indeed it seems to be the defense strategy noiretextatique Jul 2013 #17
Absolutely he is gollygee Jul 2013 #68
I don't think that's not a prosecutable offense. Nuclear Unicorn Jul 2013 #18
Unless it was precipitated by GZ? Then it's excused? Or what? Duer 157099 Jul 2013 #19
How can you establish a desire for confrontation from a non-confrontational response? Nuclear Unicorn Jul 2013 #45
GZ himself established a desire for confrontation by his own actions Duer 157099 Jul 2013 #46
Following someone is not a crime. Not having a problem with someone is not a crime. Nuclear Unicorn Jul 2013 #47
You act like those things are completely unrelated to what happened. Duer 157099 Jul 2013 #48
They are not, in and of themselves, crimes. Nuclear Unicorn Jul 2013 #50
But... Caroline-Vivienne Jul 2013 #58
There's no legal basis for that argument. Nuclear Unicorn Jul 2013 #63
yeah heaven05 Jul 2013 #66
If you feel better now perhaps you can move past your emotionalism Nuclear Unicorn Jul 2013 #76
oh please heaven05 Jul 2013 #121
You realize you lose all credibility when you resort to attacking the poster joeglow3 Jul 2013 #125
I honestly believe the intent is to shout down anyone that questions. Nuclear Unicorn Jul 2013 #130
Why hasn't the prosecutor advanced the OP's argument? Nuclear Unicorn Jul 2013 #129
"And since Zimmerman walked away from the scene without any stitches and didn't need a hospital stay Jenoch Jul 2013 #110
Taken individually, GZ's actions were mostly legal Nevernose Jul 2013 #53
Like the typical troublemaker, he chose to create drama rather than make a genuine, civilized pacalo Jul 2013 #23
He got out of his car, chased the kid and shot him. Rex Jul 2013 #38
" He got out of his car, chased the kid and shot him." Jenoch Jul 2013 #69
I've always had a problem with Z's claim that Trayvon said "You got me" upon being shot. crim son Jul 2013 #39
If anything, I can imagine saying "You SHOT me!" Duer 157099 Jul 2013 #42
Only people in old ganster movies brush Jul 2013 #105
Z's claim that M said "you are going to die tonight" sounds way too self serving. arely staircase Jul 2013 #60
That never happened. H2O Man Jul 2013 #62
if Martin was being followed and was runnig from him B2G Jul 2013 #70
Because he was almost home.... TeeYiYi Jul 2013 #73
Martin was on the phone with his friend....the one who testified last week. He was concerned Grammy23 Jul 2013 #75
How many black teenagers would think to call the cops if they are being chased? yardwork Jul 2013 #79
No kidding. For that matter, white teenagers would also be unlikely to call 911 Duer 157099 Jul 2013 #81
Post removed Post removed Jul 2013 #80
(facepalm) flvegan Jul 2013 #88
Context is everything Duer 157099 Jul 2013 #99
Really? flvegan Jul 2013 #106
Message auto-removed Name removed Jul 2013 #133
I'd just like to say... sofa king Jul 2013 #136
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The lie that Zimmerman to...»Reply #18