General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: I'm gobsmacked that this post seems to be necessary: A Presentation of Godwin's Law: [View all]quakerboy
(14,851 posts)Who makes that determination, exactly?
And godwins law does not invalidate the fact that there are Nazi wannabe's out there. I ran into one the other day, tossing off white supremacist rhetoric. I called him on it, and he claimed not to agree with nazis, just to be proud of his race. seeing as we were in a public forum where claiming it would have had an immediate negative result.
And I would bet that there are at least a few white supremacists on DU. Given the number of people on DU and the way people feel all sneaky and accomplished when they infiltrate the other guy, I would bet good money theres at least one DU'r who would claim to be a Nazi, if he were being honest.
That said, it largely misses the point. Its funny, one side feels the other is akin to the nazis in spirit of accepting oppression of people, whereas the other seems to feel that its conversational opponents are automatically racist because they oppose some of the policy's of the first black president. Interesting to see the two parts of Naziism separated and each side holding one aspect of it against the other.
I do wonder who was the "most evil" comparison in 1925, the pre nazi nazi, if you will. Before The Nazi's, who was the worst, the one you wouldn't want to be compared to. For people living in Germany, as Hitler came to power, if they compared him to this prenazi-nazi, would they have been "unreliable fools"? I would guess many Germans would have said so at the time. Because none of us ever know for certain the motivations of others, nor can we reliably predict the future on such a grand scale.