Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Demo_Chris

(6,234 posts)
23. Pretty much. I prefer to think of them as....
Tue Jul 2, 2013, 12:37 AM
Jul 2013

Clowns in a circus. I picture them running around whacking each other with giant comedic hammers, pies are flying, it looks like they are really mad at each other, but whether they are the good clown we are supposed to chear for, or the mean clown we boo, all the clown's paychecks are all signed by the same company. They are employees putting on a show.

Something most people don't consider... if Obama and Romney are both financed by Exxon and Goldman and Monsanto and UnitedHealth and Dow and Lockheed and GE, why would anyone believe that they EVER intended to do anything different? Do people believe these companies give this money away out of the kindness of their non-existent hearts?

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

She needs to disavow TIA or I can't support her. dkf Jul 2013 #1
A transient ischemic attack? still_one Jul 2013 #2
Total information awareness. Ugh. dkf Jul 2013 #5
Just saying, TIAs are a common medical conditions still_one Jul 2013 #6
If she's had any that is trouble. dkf Jul 2013 #24
No, A Mexican Aunt jberryhill Jul 2013 #28
Thanks In Advance? markiv Jul 2013 #13
In my opinion, she would be very similar to President Obama. ZombieHorde Jul 2013 #3
Honestly, probably very little difference. TDale313 Jul 2013 #4
The signature. yourout Jul 2013 #7
+1 im1013 Jul 2013 #25
Likely more of the same. MUCH more. More war, more spying, more FTAs, more corporatism... Demo_Chris Jul 2013 #8
^ someone who gets it markiv Jul 2013 #12
Pretty much. I prefer to think of them as.... Demo_Chris Jul 2013 #23
Perot in 1992 was my wake up call markiv Jul 2013 #17
I was just a kid, but even I understood what would happen when free trade passed... Demo_Chris Jul 2013 #26
In 1992, the oldest Boomer was 46. The youngest was 28. Art_from_Ark Jul 2013 #35
and baby boomers were heavy Perot voters markiv Jul 2013 #40
Warren 2016 (nt) NYC_SKP Jul 2013 #9
??? William769 Jul 2013 #14
Damn auto-fill! NYC_SKP Jul 2013 #16
I'm a nit picker this evening. William769 Jul 2013 #19
Is there anything wrong with been negative about policies? idwiyo Jul 2013 #10
she would be similar to Obama, W, her husband, GHW Bush, Reagan markiv Jul 2013 #11
True OhioChick Jul 2013 #15
"She’s also taken a leading part in drafting the Trans-Pacific Partnership..." antigop Jul 2013 #37
Just more of the same tired old DLC, 3rd Way, "not as bad", policies with less charisma. Tierra_y_Libertad Jul 2013 #18
there will be no main differences madrchsod Jul 2013 #20
I don't want Hillary, I don't want Joe. I voted for Hillary in the 2008 Primary... but won't again. cherokeeprogressive Jul 2013 #21
I don't suppose we could wait until the actual presidential election? BainsBane Jul 2013 #22
This ^^^^^^ treestar Jul 2013 #39
The choice of which Bush appointee to fill a slot edgineered Jul 2013 #27
LOL leftstreet Jul 2013 #31
I think many of her policies would be substantially similar dsc Jul 2013 #29
Yup, a lil more rhetorical heat against the TeaPubliKlans, maybe ease up on the teachers some, more TheKentuckian Jul 2013 #30
Opposition to DLC policies will make us misogynists, not racists leftstreet Jul 2013 #32
I was equally negative about both of them LWolf Jul 2013 #33
Hillary Clinton worked at the Rose Law Firm which represented Monsanto Fire Walk With Me Jul 2013 #34
No difference. Hillary is very pro-establishment. She won't change a thing. davidn3600 Jul 2013 #36
I doubt there would be much difference treestar Jul 2013 #38
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»What would be the main di...»Reply #23