Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

WingDinger

(3,690 posts)
51. Here goes. I will analyze.
Wed Feb 15, 2012, 05:37 PM
Feb 2012

""So to meet those requirements, the child was given chicken nuggets. ""

The childs lunch was supplimented by three chicken nuggets, boiled.

""The agent was inspecting the entire class' lunch boxes that day. ""

Maybe even, the school was teaching nutrition. So, THAT ONE DAY, lunches were checked for complete food groups.

""The state's Department of Health and Human Services requires that all lunches served to pre-kindergarten students -- whether from school or home -- meet USDA meal guidelines of one serving each of meat, milk and grain, and two servings of fruit or vegetables.""

Laudable goal. Transparent way to impliment it, controvertial. No budget for those things, an unfunded mandate. So, charge parents, to comply with the laudable goal. Instead, funding for the school lunch program, should be supplimented, to add, at no additional charge, what your sack lunch is missing. And your meal from the cafeteria, also meet those USDA nutritional guidelines.

""It's unclear to state officials why, exactly, the girl's meal was deemed insufficient"

The persons responsible for the guidelines, cant figure out how that lunchlady got it so wrong.

""but Jani Kozlowski, fiscal and statutory policy manager for the Division of Child Development told the Carolina Journal that the meal should have met guidelines.""

Our policy is not responsible for this witch hunt.

"""With a turkey sandwich, that covers your protein, your grain, and if it had cheese on it, that's the dairy," Kozlowski said. "It sounds like the lunch itself would’ve met all of the standard."""

Let me reiterate, that is NOT our policy.

""The struggle to comply with USDA guidelines in school meals is not new. Celebrity chef and TV personality Jamie Oliver spent years trying to remove flavored milk from school cafeterias. The target: glucose.""

That damn limey should mind his own business.

"" While flavored milk met USDA guidelines for dairy, those recommendations ignore the fact that a carton of flavored milk often contained more sugar than a can of soda.""

They need the energy.

""In the first move of its kind in over 15 years, the government last month announced new guidelines to ensure students are given healthier options for school meals. The new standards call for more whole grains and produce as well as less sodium and fat in school meals.""

No really good change, is simple to impliment, on a grand scale. There is a learning curve.

""While the measures mark a step forward from previous years, they still compromise amid push-back from Congress to keep pizza and french fries on the menu -- counting both the tomato paste on pizza and the potatoes that make fries as vegetables. ""

Screw it. Then you make them eat that rabbit food.

"" Even with the researchers' low-cost idea, schools still face costly issues. For school districts to comply with new federal regulations that bring in fresh fruits and vegetables, they have seen a rise in prices,""

Like I said, an unfunded mandate, dumped on undereducated folks, to deal with, or face harsh rhetoric, about they being the enemy.

This is a strawman argument, just like any odd internet spam heart tug story, meant to manipulate you into actions against the scapegoat, or scapegoats. This time, being the lunchladies, that are not paid well, work five days a week, four hours a day, requiring they all have multiple jobs. They have families, and usually have most of their resume, that school or in the school system. They are saddled with perfect upbringing of our children, in the absence of our giving a shit as a society. Or paying for it. Hell, lets have another lottery. That will take care of shit.





Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I've seen this story all over FB today, but nowhere did I see where it said the school took away the Brickbat Feb 2012 #1
I would hazard a guess Nuclear Unicorn Feb 2012 #6
There is EVERY reason for lunches to be inspected. WingDinger Feb 2012 #9
There should probably inspections at the door next to the metal detectors. Snake Alchemist Feb 2012 #10
You are right, children should be raised to be good libertarians. And if a child is hurt on the play WingDinger Feb 2012 #11
Best to just not allow them to bring their lunch and have state issued meals instead. nt Snake Alchemist Feb 2012 #12
I'm sure you dont intend to be flip, and insular about raising our next generation. Or you wouldnt WingDinger Feb 2012 #13
Requiring lunch inspections is not the answer. Snake Alchemist Feb 2012 #14
If you are noticed, being pulled aside, to address your deprivations, you will be stigmatized. WingDinger Feb 2012 #23
Like the TSA. Sounds brilliant. Snake Alchemist Feb 2012 #24
lets have government inspection of all foods going into the mom's kitchens ASAP :-) nt msongs Feb 2012 #29
I started to say that in an earlier post but deleted it. Nuclear Unicorn Feb 2012 #34
How many children are being killed by turkey and cheese sandwhiches with a banana? Nuclear Unicorn Feb 2012 #18
Are you aware, that five year olds, are showing the beginnings of heart disease? WingDinger Feb 2012 #27
Who was on their own? The child had food provided. Nuclear Unicorn Feb 2012 #32
One silly lunchlady, does not a big brother suffocating all encompassing intrusion make. WingDinger Feb 2012 #37
"One silly lunchlady, does not a big brother suffocating all encompassing intrusion make." Nuclear Unicorn Feb 2012 #42
You dont know what you are being manipulated into asking for. WingDinger Feb 2012 #43
I dated guys in college, I know when I'm being manipulated, thank-you. Nuclear Unicorn Feb 2012 #44
Was that lunchlady instructed to dissallow turkey and cheese? Or was it a mistake? WingDinger Feb 2012 #45
According to what I've read it's because the lunch lacked vegetables per HHS guidelines. Nuclear Unicorn Feb 2012 #47
Here goes. I will analyze. WingDinger Feb 2012 #51
Unless there is probable cause of neglect why is there even a lunch inspection? Nuclear Unicorn Feb 2012 #52
Screw your idea about the noble savage. Kids dont bring themselves up. WingDinger Feb 2012 #55
Please show how there was any indication of child neglect Nuclear Unicorn Feb 2012 #65
Last time I checked, chicken nuggets aren't veggies WolverineDG Feb 2012 #77
How this is overlooked, I can't guess other than willful misdirection. TheKentuckian Feb 2012 #114
are you serious? noiretextatique Feb 2012 #54
My mom manages one, and has worked in many. WingDinger Feb 2012 #56
i get your point...it is a low-paying job noiretextatique Feb 2012 #61
That's the point... JSnuffy Feb 2012 #68
i would have dared you to call my wife "One silly lunchlady" hobbit709 Feb 2012 #87
I ate ham and cheese sandwiches with mustard Aerows Feb 2012 #49
Just admit Fox told you to hate poor kids eating school lunch. Nuclear Unicorn Feb 2012 #53
LOL Aerows Feb 2012 #82
You should have told them you converted to Judaism. Nuclear Unicorn Feb 2012 #86
I live in the south Aerows Feb 2012 #105
This message was self-deleted by its author noiretextatique Feb 2012 #57
There was nothing wrong with that lunch n/t TheCruces Feb 2012 #84
I think the "inspector" newspeak Feb 2012 #15
If that is the case then their genius is to be applauded for Nuclear Unicorn Feb 2012 #22
If that is your definition of genius, then this publication is for you. WingDinger Feb 2012 #30
Where in the OP was there any evidence of the child being left hungry? Nuclear Unicorn Feb 2012 #33
This is an attack against school lunch programs, by the same kind of outrage news as Faux. WingDinger Feb 2012 #40
Don't be absurd. This is an attack against meddling busybodies. Nuclear Unicorn Feb 2012 #41
Something about this story sounds like B.S. MNBrewer Feb 2012 #2
I agree, or just a very stupid school district. chrisa Feb 2012 #7
Agreed. Raine1967 Feb 2012 #8
I agree Mz Pip Feb 2012 #102
I'm saying that I don't think it happened MNBrewer Feb 2012 #103
Low fat boiled nuggets to be exact Skink Feb 2012 #3
urp! Nuclear Unicorn Feb 2012 #25
Carolina journal is right wing pub put out bt Art Pope sammytko Feb 2012 #4
Not just that... GoCubsGo Feb 2012 #38
As there is an attack on feeding the poor, so there is an attack on feeding the poor children. WingDinger Feb 2012 #5
i see your point now noiretextatique Feb 2012 #59
Geez. Can we ask for a little critical thinking here? Viking12 Feb 2012 #16
Seriously??? richmwill Feb 2012 #17
My son would have gotten ill from the chemical laden "nuggets". Although today he does not get as tsuki Feb 2012 #19
this "inspector" reminds me of the lunchlady at my elementary school tabbycat31 Feb 2012 #20
Deep fried pink sludge is healthier than a sandwich? arikara Feb 2012 #21
You can "see" confiscating the kid's chips? Johnny Rico Feb 2012 #31
Oh. Is that what I said? arikara Feb 2012 #64
Yes. You did. Johnny Rico Feb 2012 #75
You are the one that didnt read the story. WingDinger Feb 2012 #80
On the contrary; it appears you didn't read my post. Johnny Rico Feb 2012 #85
I should not have responded the first time as I rarely respond when I'm annoyed arikara Feb 2012 #108
Given that you seem to be annoyed right now, why did you just respond? Johnny Rico Feb 2012 #109
This BS reminds me of the rules at the preschool kitchen I worked at. Odin2005 Feb 2012 #26
Diana Moon Glampers will make sure no child has a lunch that is better than that of any other child slackmaster Feb 2012 #28
I wonder if the substituted chicken nuggets Nuclear Unicorn Feb 2012 #35
"...that one was a doozy." petronius Feb 2012 #112
Sounds like someone's getting kickbacks. nt Javaman Feb 2012 #36
Indeed, the school lunch programs are also farmer support programs. WingDinger Feb 2012 #39
I think this is mountain out of molehill Southerner Feb 2012 #46
"or the inspector overstepped his or her bounds" Nuclear Unicorn Feb 2012 #48
Why do you get off on VAN JONESING? WingDinger Feb 2012 #62
Calm down, you're panicking because you can't win. Nuclear Unicorn Feb 2012 #67
If you are concerned about school indoctrination, you home school, or go parochial/ private. WingDinger Feb 2012 #70
Who said anything about indoctrination? Nuclear Unicorn Feb 2012 #72
Forcing inspection, is to indoctrinate children to eat their veggies. And ensure good nutrition. WingDinger Feb 2012 #81
Oh please. Ron Paul is not only a racist ass he's manifestly dangerous Nuclear Unicorn Feb 2012 #88
More likely Unicorn Mountain. The whole story is a pure fabrication. Viking12 Feb 2012 #50
You have it down. WingDinger Feb 2012 #63
You say it's a false story but then you demand the power to make it true. Nuclear Unicorn Feb 2012 #69
A manipulative tale usually has some toe in reality. Then uses psyops, to get you to agree. WingDinger Feb 2012 #71
"psyops"? Seriously? Nuclear Unicorn Feb 2012 #73
I went line by line, and you still were invested in vengeance, and outrage. WingDinger Feb 2012 #74
It's not a psyop. Nuclear Unicorn Feb 2012 #76
Is this truly a national issue? One lunch lady that didnt understand? WingDinger Feb 2012 #79
Make-up your mind. Nuclear Unicorn Feb 2012 #89
It's not about me. It is about the ubiquitous YOU. WingDinger Feb 2012 #94
Children are not property, they're part of a family. Nuclear Unicorn Feb 2012 #96
People are NOT greater than government. People ARE government. WingDinger Feb 2012 #97
So if the people are government why is the government Nuclear Unicorn Feb 2012 #98
The reason why Gov keeps pissing off people is: WingDinger Feb 2012 #99
I'm totally on-board with the first 2 paragraphs Nuclear Unicorn Feb 2012 #104
Post removed Post removed Feb 2012 #58
Potato chips are deemed junk food in certain schools yup its me Feb 2012 #60
And don't forget a tall, cool glass of Brawndo to wash 'em down with. Gidney N Cloyd Feb 2012 #66
N/t sammytko Feb 2012 #78
You know, I'm really wondering... jmowreader Feb 2012 #83
Exactly. n/t renie408 Feb 2012 #90
Half a sandwich isn't an unreasonable amount of food for a preschooler. gkhouston Feb 2012 #101
Half a sandwich with almost no meat in it is a different story jmowreader Feb 2012 #110
Yes, but that's still an "if". On CNN this morning, they said the problem was no milk gkhouston Feb 2012 #111
The worst thing is, I read somewhere what nuggets and other ground up chicken "patties" truth2power Feb 2012 #91
Hop on youtube christx30 Feb 2012 #107
For all of you ranting that THIS lunch was a good lunch, so the requirements are stupid renie408 Feb 2012 #92
Apparently the original sack lunch was sent home uneaten. Nuclear Unicorn Feb 2012 #93
Is there another article that you got that information from? Cause what I read... renie408 Feb 2012 #95
CNN ran this today. Claim is now that the kid was sent through the lunch line to buy milk. gkhouston Feb 2012 #100
The folks on Tea Party Patriots Mz Pip Feb 2012 #106
So a 4 year old told her mom her lunch was thrown out and she HAD TO eat chicken nuggets proud2BlibKansan Feb 2012 #113
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»School Lunch: Preschooler...»Reply #51