Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

avebury

(11,193 posts)
6. I waver betwen hung jury and innocent.
Tue Jul 2, 2013, 11:33 AM
Jul 2013

I personally think that he is guilty of Murder 2 but think that the DA over reached by not going for manslaughter.

I think that the jury will not be able to let go of the fact that there are cultural and generational differences between themselves and the girl on the phone withe Martin. The DA's office has allowed to much of Zimmerman's statements to go unchallenged. Too many witnesses are parroting Zimmerman's words. The guy that wrote the book is just delivering hearsay testimony. They are letting everybody under the moon give Zimmerman's testimony which puts Zimmerman in the position of not having to get on the stand. It is Zimmerman's right to not testify but it is the DAs job to try to push Zimmerman into having to get on the stand.

The DAs should have picked a fixed number of important, undeniable points and keep hammering away on them. Those points are the ones that they should keep coming back to over and over in order to reinforce them.

The only thing that would help the prosecution is if they have some analytical and/or logical thinkers on the jury. The potential problem for the Defense with allowing all there witnesses to keep harping on Zimmerman's story (stories) is that an analytical thinker will start noting the inconsistencies, figure out the BS, and start thinking - Now wait a minute. The more I keep hearing Zimmerman's story the more I keep thinking he is full of sh*t and I don't believe him.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Pass Cirque du So-What Jul 2013 #1
Does the jury have the discretion to find zimmerman brush Jul 2013 #2
Yes, premium Jul 2013 #3
The interesting thing about the lesser charge Jenoch Jul 2013 #7
Yeah, that's interesting, premium Jul 2013 #10
Except self-defense is an affirmative defense to manslaughter as well kudzu22 Jul 2013 #11
Does FL require unanimity with a 6-person jury? (nt) Recursion Jul 2013 #4
I believe so. I think that in criminal cases, MineralMan Jul 2013 #9
You're correct, premium Jul 2013 #13
Not guilty, but he will lose a civil suit. denverbill Jul 2013 #5
Is that an option? michreject Jul 2013 #18
I don't think Florida allows a civil suit if Z is found not guilty. nt Llewlladdwr Jul 2013 #30
I waver betwen hung jury and innocent. avebury Jul 2013 #6
"Acquitted" does not equal "innocent" in the eyes of the law. WinkyDink Jul 2013 #12
Correct, premium Jul 2013 #14
What judicial decision customerserviceguy Jul 2013 #28
This is Florida. moondust Jul 2013 #8
No idea- who knows what is in the jury's mind Marrah_G Jul 2013 #15
It's looking like a not guilty michreject Jul 2013 #16
I'm wavering between an acquittal and manslaughter and hoping for the latter. DemocratSinceBirth Jul 2013 #17
probably a not guilty verdict rollin74 Jul 2013 #19
he'll walk--young black lives are considered cheap in the US, especially the old confederacy. nt geek tragedy Jul 2013 #20
He walks. Scot-free. Period. Bake Jul 2013 #21
Tend to agree zipplewrath Jul 2013 #22
Scot free except for one thing customerserviceguy Jul 2013 #29
kick rollin74 Jul 2013 #23
no way to tell TorchTheWitch Jul 2013 #24
It's a pipi_k Jul 2013 #25
The judge will bang a gavel jberryhill Jul 2013 #26
deadlock nt Incitatus Jul 2013 #27
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»How do you think the Zimm...»Reply #6