Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)It was GREENWALD who called out Bush and Cheney on ILLEGAL N.S.A. Spying back in 2007! [View all]
If the rest of the press had carried half as much water as Greenwald, these two would have long ago been in front of a Grand Jury.

Here's what Greenwald wrote on the subject of NSA abuse by them, when the story broke in 2007. In his story, Greenwald raised questions about the Comey visit to Ashcroft that have still to be answered -- six long warmongering profiteering years later:
Comeys testimony raises new and vital questions about the NSA scandal
The testimony yesterday, while dramatic, underscores how severe a threat to the rule of law this administration poses.
BY GLENN GREENWALD
WEDNESDAY, MAY 16, 2007 06:16 AM EDT
The testimony yesterday from James Comey re-focuses attention on one of the long unresolved mysteries of the NSA scandal. And the new information Comey revealed, though not answering that question decisively, suggests some deeply troubling answers. Most of all, yesterdays hearing underscores how unresolved the entire NSA matter is how little we know (but ought to know) about what actually happened and how little accountability there has been for some of the most severe and blatant acts of presidential lawbreaking in the countrys history.
SNIP...
The key questions still demanding investigation and answers
But the more important issue here, by far, is that we should not have to speculate in this way about how the illegal eavesdropping powers were used. We enacted a law 30 years ago making it a felony for the government to eavesdrop on us without warrants, precisely because that power had been so severely and continuously abused. The President deliberately violated that law by eavesdropping in secret. Why dont we know a-year-a-half after this lawbreaking was revealed whether these eavesdropping powers were abused for improper purposes? Is anyone in Congress investigating that question? Why dont we know the answers to that?
Back in September, the then-ranking member (and current Chairman) of the Senate Intelligence Committee, Jay Rockefeller, made clear how little even he knew about the answers to any of these questions in a letter he released:
For the past six months, I have been requesting without success specific details about the program, including: how many terrorists have been identified; how many arrested; how many convicted; and how many terrorists have been deported or killed as a direct result of information obtained through the warrantless wiretapping program.
[font size="6"][font color="red"]I can assure you, not one person in Congress has the answers to these and many other fundamental questions.[/font size][/font color]
CONTINUED...
http://www.salon.com/2007/05/16/nsa_comey/
Instead, six years and who-knows-how-many lives later, Bush and Cheney and the rest of their election thieving warmongering bankster oilmen posse continue merrily on their way, unpunished for lying America into war and making huge profits in the process.
Remember, it was Greenwald who stood up to Cheney and Bush. He covered the story and asked "Why?"
89 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
It was GREENWALD who called out Bush and Cheney on ILLEGAL N.S.A. Spying back in 2007! [View all]
Octafish
Jul 2013
OP
We were reporting on something illegal during Bush. My article demanded we go back to FISA.
stevenleser
Jul 2013
#67
And none did a better job than Greenwald. Which is why a contract was taken out on him
sabrina 1
Jul 2013
#39
Tons of people did it better and much earlier than Greenwald. Here are just two examples of articles
stevenleser
Jul 2013
#66
"If someone testified before Congress when Glenn wasn't around, it didn't really happen!"
struggle4progress
Jul 2013
#3
Yes, I remember his excellent journalism throughout the Bush era of high crimes and misdeamors.
sabrina 1
Jul 2013
#4
Thank you Octafish, Greenwald is what a journalist ought to be. His specialty has always
sabrina 1
Jul 2013
#37
Verily. The guy went after Bush and Cheney when his critics were uniting behind the preznit.
Octafish
Jul 2013
#72
Google tip = Combine any keyword with the following: "L. Coyote" site:democraticunderground.com
Coyotl
Jul 2013
#89
the professional punditry were giving bush blow jobs until well into his second term.
HiPointDem
Jul 2013
#48
Sounds like we're in the same demographic roughly speaking. For me the long, slow descent began
HardTimes99
Jul 2013
#31
Pelosi took impeachment off the table in 2006. And wouldn't you know it, back in 2002,
HardTimes99
Jul 2013
#28
Well, isn't that incovenient for some DUers (who also forget it's all about Bush/Cheney). n/t
Fire Walk With Me
Jul 2013
#24
I wonder what the Group will say when Pres Obama pardons Bush and Cheney. nm
rhett o rick
Jul 2013
#55
I sadly imagine many here will praise Obama for his capacity for mercy. n/t
Fire Walk With Me
Jul 2013
#64
Notice how the people who have been relentlessy taunting and attacking you are
HardTimes99
Jul 2013
#34
no! it was Lieberman and Harold Ford! they were the only ones resisting the lefty mobs'
MisterP
Jul 2013
#44
Greenwald isn't standing up to anyone. Jay Rockefeller is, and nine months earlier.
ucrdem
Jul 2013
#47
Nice dodge. No one is forcing you to choose. It appears from your posts you side with Clapper,
rhett o rick
Jul 2013
#82