General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Obama’s Brilliant Move Deals A Blow To The GOP’s 2014 Hopes [View all]Yo_Mama
(8,303 posts)The last thing voters want to hear is that the law is that you have to have insurance but the employer doesn't have to pay for it, nor if they provide it, does it need to be affordable.
Sorry, this just doesn't go with the country's mood (which is Dem).
Are those who were ever likely at all to vote Dem next year going to be wiping sweat from their brows and saying "OMG, I'm so glad my employer isn't being faced with a fine for not providing insurance for me?" Doesn't Holtz-Eakin sound like a loon for saying that?
Also it's going to hurt, because this means one major source of funding for the exchanges is cut out of the system for another year, which is going to make the law far more costly. In a few weeks CBO will publish another projection. That's fodder for ACA opponents.
Effectively this probably also means that the individual mandate is dead (how can the IRS fine people?) for the year, so that means there won't be any source of funding?