Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
72. Verily. The guy went after Bush and Cheney when his critics were uniting behind the preznit.
Wed Jul 3, 2013, 04:34 PM
Jul 2013

Now that he's criticized the current president, it's open season from all sides.

As you know, we live in gangster times, fascisthunter. Tell me, please, since when do brave and good people need to "assassinate" anyone?



Obama moves to make the War on Terror permanent

Complete with a newly coined, creepy Orwellian euphemism – 'disposition matrix' – the administration institutionalizes the most extremist powers a government can claim

Glenn Greenwald
The Guardian 24 Oct 2013

A primary reason for opposing the acquisition of abusive powers and civil liberties erosions is that they virtually always become permanent, vested not only in current leaders one may love and trust but also future officials who seem more menacing and less benign.

The Washington Post has a crucial and disturbing story this morning by Greg Miller about the concerted efforts by the Obama administration to fully institutionalize – to make officially permanent – the most extremist powers it has exercised in the name of the war on terror.

SNIP...

UPDATE III

At Wired, Spencer Ackerman reacts to the Post article with an analysis entitled "President Romney Can Thank Obama for His Permanent Robotic Death List". Here is his concluding paragraph:

"Obama did not run for president to preside over the codification of a global war fought in secret. But that's his legacy. . . . Micah Zenko at the Council on Foreign Relations writes that Obama's predecessors in the Bush administration 'were actually much more conscious and thoughtful about the long-term implications of targeted killings', because they feared the political consequences that might come when the U.S. embraces something at least superficially similar to assassination. Whoever follows Obama in the Oval Office can thank him for proving those consequences don't meaningfully exist — as he or she reviews the backlog of names on the Disposition Matrix."

It's worth devoting a moment to letting that sink in.

CONTINUED...

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2012/oct/24/obama-terrorism-kill-list?newsfeed=true



My answer: Since when warmongers and traitors call the shots. Besides the war and deaths and Have-Mores and all, what really makes it obvious is the sinking of democracy.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Back when Greenwald was a DU hero leftstreet Jul 2013 #1
True. True even before then. Octafish Jul 2013 #7
+ 100 truebluegreen Jul 2013 #12
As did I and thousands of other people stevenleser Jul 2013 #2
Precisely, and DU was in the thick of investigating this then Coyotl Jul 2013 #8
We were reporting on something illegal during Bush. My article demanded we go back to FISA. stevenleser Jul 2013 #67
I agree. Regarding the hyperbole on DU, anyone can register an account Coyotl Jul 2013 #75
I suspect Karl Rove's Crossroads is on of DU's top contributors emulatorloo Jul 2013 #76
You're a good writer and a brave man, stevenleser! Octafish Jul 2013 #9
And none did a better job than Greenwald. Which is why a contract was taken out on him sabrina 1 Jul 2013 #39
Tons of people did it better and much earlier than Greenwald. Here are just two examples of articles stevenleser Jul 2013 #66
Appreciate the links, Steve. Remember reading both of those articles n/t emulatorloo Jul 2013 #77
"If someone testified before Congress when Glenn wasn't around, it didn't really happen!" struggle4progress Jul 2013 #3
Greenwald on N.S.A. crimes under Bush... Octafish Jul 2013 #16
Yes, I remember his excellent journalism throughout the Bush era of high crimes and misdeamors. sabrina 1 Jul 2013 #4
What will be done about James Comey's revelations? Octafish Jul 2013 #30
Thank you Octafish, Greenwald is what a journalist ought to be. His specialty has always sabrina 1 Jul 2013 #37
OMG the TWISTEDNESS of the man's long term STRATEGY sibelian Jul 2013 #5
Now that's some 13-dimensional chess! :sarcasm: - nt HardTimes99 Jul 2013 #25
Not that they wouldn't, it's just that it's a dying art. Octafish Jul 2013 #43
Nope, no he didn't. baldguy Jul 2013 #6
Oh look...there are more simple facts you refuse to acknowledge DisgustipatedinCA Jul 2013 #19
+1 uponit7771 Jul 2013 #21
The difference is right there in your title line. KEYWORD: "ILLEGAL". Tarheel_Dem Jul 2013 #10
Did I miss something? truebluegreen Jul 2013 #13
See! He TOTALLY changed his point of view because he's a RACIST MannyGoldstein Jul 2013 #11
Wow! Maybe *that's* why Greenwald wasn't even a reporter in 2005. Octafish Jul 2013 #70
consistently courageous = credibility fascisthunter Jul 2013 #14
Verily. The guy went after Bush and Cheney when his critics were uniting behind the preznit. Octafish Jul 2013 #72
Deja DU's Coyotl Jul 2013 #15
Great term. Important phenomenon. Octafish Jul 2013 #88
Google tip = Combine any keyword with the following: "L. Coyote" site:democraticunderground.com Coyotl Jul 2013 #89
What were David Gregory and Chuck Todd saying Hooray for Pepe Jul 2013 #17
the professional punditry were giving bush blow jobs until well into his second term. HiPointDem Jul 2013 #48
Thanks for the reality check, Octafish. Waiting For Everyman Jul 2013 #18
Why is congress so afraid to use their oversight responsibility nineteen50 Jul 2013 #20
One of the NSA whistleblowers (think it may be Tice) alleges that HardTimes99 Jul 2013 #26
No! it is "f"ing scary. nineteen50 Jul 2013 #29
Sounds like we're in the same demographic roughly speaking. For me the long, slow descent began HardTimes99 Jul 2013 #31
I thought at that time the nineteen50 Jul 2013 #36
My memories have grown a bit hazy with the passage of time and so HardTimes99 Jul 2013 #38
no, it's scary. tapping politicians is scary. HiPointDem Jul 2013 #49
nineteen50 - follow the money. truedelphi Jul 2013 #41
I was aware of Di's bio. nineteen50 Jul 2013 #42
feinstein. ugh. HiPointDem Jul 2013 #50
K&R. Thanks for reminding people why we have admired Greenwald. Overseas Jul 2013 #22
Pelosi took impeachment off the table in 2006. And wouldn't you know it, back in 2002, HardTimes99 Jul 2013 #28
Right On bahrbearian Jul 2013 #32
Glenn speaks up about our need to fight to protect and restore our rights. Overseas Jul 2013 #53
For many on this board, supporting the Party is the first priority. Maedhros Jul 2013 #62
Kick And Recommend cantbeserious Jul 2013 #23
Well, isn't that incovenient for some DUers (who also forget it's all about Bush/Cheney). n/t Fire Walk With Me Jul 2013 #24
I wonder what the Group will say when Pres Obama pardons Bush and Cheney. nm rhett o rick Jul 2013 #55
I sadly imagine many here will praise Obama for his capacity for mercy. n/t Fire Walk With Me Jul 2013 #64
Yes, It'd be good to put that mess behind us. nm rhett o rick Jul 2013 #73
Marcy Wheeler: Hissyspit Jul 2013 #27
Yes, and I remember how most of DU rejoiced at his revelations....... DeSwiss Jul 2013 #33
Notice how the people who have been relentlessy taunting and attacking you are HardTimes99 Jul 2013 #34
+1 Their silence is louder than their applied hysteria. johnnyreb Jul 2013 #40
Considerably. sibelian Jul 2013 #46
There isn't a single one of the Snowden Sand Pit brigade, is there? sibelian Jul 2013 #45
Octafish! You're off message. Get with the program! n/t RufusTFirefly Jul 2013 #35
no! it was Lieberman and Harold Ford! they were the only ones resisting the lefty mobs' MisterP Jul 2013 #44
Greenwald isn't standing up to anyone. Jay Rockefeller is, and nine months earlier. ucrdem Jul 2013 #47
Looking forward... nothing to see here upi402 Jul 2013 #51
K&R. (nt) Kurovski Jul 2013 #52
knr Douglas Carpenter Jul 2013 #54
Hero Then. Horrible Person Now Jakes Progress Jul 2013 #56
Actually, ProSense Jul 2013 #57
Ha. And blogging about it two years later ucrdem Jul 2013 #58
Well said. B Stieg Jul 2013 #63
So what? Poppy Bush lied America into war with Iraq in 1991. Octafish Jul 2013 #60
K & R !!! WillyT Jul 2013 #59
Thank you! meegbear Jul 2013 #61
knr Douglas Carpenter Jul 2013 #65
K & R Quantess Jul 2013 #68
kick...no text Kurovski Jul 2013 #69
Geezus, MORE Greenwald worshipping railsback Jul 2013 #71
And you choose Republicans like Clapper, Mueller, and Bernanke. nm rhett o rick Jul 2013 #74
Sorry, I didn't know I was being forced to choose anybody railsback Jul 2013 #81
Nice dodge. No one is forcing you to choose. It appears from your posts you side with Clapper, rhett o rick Jul 2013 #82
Here we are six years later, we still haven't gotten a solid answer to Sen. Rockefeller's question leveymg Jul 2013 #78
Mission Accomplished... Octafish Jul 2013 #87
i keep forgetting greenwald is an opinion writer madrchsod Jul 2013 #79
Liberals and free thinkers tend to have principles that don't change Doctor_J Jul 2013 #80
Doctor_J, you have defined 'Character.' Octafish Jul 2013 #86
The last thing I want is a dirtbag like Greenwald... gulliver Jul 2013 #83
+1000 blackspade Jul 2013 #84
Kicked and recommended. Uncle Joe Jul 2013 #85
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»It was GREENWALD who call...»Reply #72