Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: I don't get it [View all]Buzz Clik
(38,437 posts)6. Gratefully, DU represents NOTHING and NO ONE but the people here
DU does not represent Democrats. DU does not represent liberals/progressives.
This place is a mix of extreme left wing reactionaries; dozens upon dozens of rightwing trolls and moles; bored people who are always waiting for the next "outrage" to make them feel alive.
Critical thinking is rare. Science comes to DU to die. Focus is replaced by blurred vision, and attention spans are immeasurably short. DUers are notorious for having closed minds. Hysteria and hyperbole reign supreme.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
97 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
And if it turns out to be Ms. Clinton vs. Gov. Christie, a lot of people will stay home. nm
rhett o rick
Jul 2013
#88
"By the way, does Dick Armey pay you by the word or letter to post such observations at DU?"
Buzz Clik
Jul 2013
#10
Ok. So I'll answer your question, and then you must answer a question from me.
Buzz Clik
Jul 2013
#27
Extreme left is said to be radical. Extreme right is said to be reactionary
DisgustipatedinCA
Jul 2013
#47
R v W stems from the 4th. If they can rationalize blanket surveillance what protects RvW?
dkf
Jul 2013
#81
I was being generous and assuming that no thinking person would post something that stupid
Fumesucker
Jul 2013
#39
The fact is that the argument about government spying is because of who holds the executive
Fumesucker
Jul 2013
#44
The media's focusing on Snowden is a diversionary tactic and you are falling for it.
alarimer
Jul 2013
#28