General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: This may not be a popular idea, but we didn't fight for your freedom. [View all]JackN415
(924 posts)is morally justified?
I state it (semi-serious) as just a historical interpretation. But most human wars, or for that matter, primate wars that we know of including chimps, have significant economic consequences: gaining territories, bounties/goodies, enslaved labors, trade advantages, market shares, and even in more primitive times,.. DNA-motivated cause like reproductive advantages by gaining child-bearing women (think of Gengis Khan DNA prevalence, or warrior genes in Amazon Indians).
It's in the gene of the species. But it's also in the gene of species that humans are capable of empathy and altruism with a learning capability to generalize and extend the objects of empathy beyond the home clan kinship, race, country to the ever broader circle encompassing all humanity, which enables you to think of the millions who died.
It wasn't always so. Even as recent as mid 20th century, the famous Gen. Westmoreland stated that Asians didn't care much about life, so.. what does it matter that we napalmed all the sub-human gooks?