General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: This may not be a popular idea, but we didn't fight for your freedom. [View all]JackRiddler
(24,979 posts)by which imperialism is justified to the metropolitan population. We have to kill them, hold them down, so that we can eat so well. Never mind that it's barbaric, it's also untrue, or at any rate by no means clear.
Show your calculation of the costs.
I say pulverizing half of all federal revenues on the empire is a net loss to the 90% of the population.
I say the surveillance state and the police state and all those costs, all of which are greater due to imperialism, are a net loss.
I say an economy geared to war is a net loss and a huge distortion of what the economy should and could be.
A foreign policy that creates enemies around the world against which the MIC must "defend" is a net loss.
Clearly, the citizen casualties are a net loss - of course, at a ratio of 1 citizen to 20-50 foreigners, but a loss nevertheless given that it's meaningless.