General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: This may not be a popular idea, but we didn't fight for your freedom. [View all]HardTimes99
(2,049 posts)may well have helped stave off nuclear war by your sacrifices in southeast Asia.
This is a bit of a convoluted argument, so please bear with me. Daniel Ellsberg has argued elsewhere that Vietnam\Cambodia were a necessary evil for the global superpowers to have a war in an era where nuclear war would have meant the destruction of human civilization on the planet. In other words, the only place where combat could happen in the nuclear age was on the periphery of empire using conventional arms, whether that be Vietnam or Latin America.
It is so sad that so many soldiers and civilians on all sides had to sacrifice so much, in order that the great powers could have their wars while not having the ultimate war. But if Ellsberg is correct, the conflict in which you and your generation struggled so valiantly may have helped preserve mankind for a future that, while somewhat doubtful, is certainly better than death by nuclear war and radiation poisoning.
So, though our disagreements may be deep and at times fervent, please accept this small gesture of gratitude. Your sacrifices may not have been entirely in vain, if the human race is something worth preserving.