Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kentuck

(115,407 posts)
9. Wow!
Thu Jul 4, 2013, 04:15 PM
Jul 2013

That is a very difficult truth to accept. But our justice is not what it was 30 years ago because we were not vigilant enough in protecting our Bill of Rights, including the First and the Fourth Amendment.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

In a trial in which evidence is withheld because of "National Security"? I think not. Tierra_y_Libertad Jul 2013 #1
You make a good point. kentuck Jul 2013 #2
No. idwiyo Jul 2013 #3
No newfie11 Jul 2013 #4
He actually committed a crime.. HipChick Jul 2013 #5
lets see. galileoreloaded Jul 2013 #6
If we had a justice system like we did thirty years ago, I think he should come back and Cleita Jul 2013 #7
Wow! kentuck Jul 2013 #9
With this power corrupted make up their own laws crew, no way. dkf Jul 2013 #8
Snowden SamKnause Jul 2013 #10
Of course not siligut Jul 2013 #11
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Should Edward Snowden ret...»Reply #9