Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: I don't get it [View all]dkf
(37,305 posts)81. R v W stems from the 4th. If they can rationalize blanket surveillance what protects RvW?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
97 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
And if it turns out to be Ms. Clinton vs. Gov. Christie, a lot of people will stay home. nm
rhett o rick
Jul 2013
#88
"By the way, does Dick Armey pay you by the word or letter to post such observations at DU?"
Buzz Clik
Jul 2013
#10
Ok. So I'll answer your question, and then you must answer a question from me.
Buzz Clik
Jul 2013
#27
Extreme left is said to be radical. Extreme right is said to be reactionary
DisgustipatedinCA
Jul 2013
#47
R v W stems from the 4th. If they can rationalize blanket surveillance what protects RvW?
dkf
Jul 2013
#81
I was being generous and assuming that no thinking person would post something that stupid
Fumesucker
Jul 2013
#39
The fact is that the argument about government spying is because of who holds the executive
Fumesucker
Jul 2013
#44
The media's focusing on Snowden is a diversionary tactic and you are falling for it.
alarimer
Jul 2013
#28