Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: A hideous example of the state of 'health care' in AmeriKa (GOD DAMN this shit) [View all]ProSense
(116,464 posts)70. It's horrible, and just think
"A hideous example of the state of 'health care' in AmeriKa (GOD DAMN this shit)
Mom is 86 years old. Every year around April or May she falls into the "doughnut hole" of her Medicare Part D coverage. Just ONE of her prescriptions costs well over $300 for a ONE month's supply. After she hits the "doughnut hole", she has to pay out of pocket. CAN YOU IMAGINE paying that much for ONE prescription when you're on a fixed income? Just ONE of them."
...this is happening under Medicare. The donut hole was one of the biggest health care scams ever.
Krugman, 2005
A Serious Drug Problem
By PAUL KRUGMAN
There was a brief flurry of outrage when Congress passed the 2003 Medicare bill. The news media reported on the scandalous vote in the House of Representatives: Republican leaders violated parliamentary procedure, twisted arms and perhaps engaged in bribery to persuade skeptical lawmakers to change their votes in a session literally held in the dead of night.
Later, the media reported on another scandal: it turned out that the administration had deceived Congress about the bill's likely cost.
But the real scandal is what's in the legislation. It's an object lesson in how special interests hold America's health care system hostage.
The new Medicare law subsidizes private health plans, which have repeatedly failed to deliver promised cost savings. It creates an unnecessary layer of middlemen by requiring that the drug benefit be administered by private insurers. The biggest giveaway is to Big Pharma: the law specifically prohibits Medicare from using its purchasing power to negotiate lower drug prices.
Outside the United States, almost every government bargains over drug prices. And it works: the Congressional Budget Office says that foreign drug prices are 35 to 55 percent below U.S. levels. Even within the United States, Veterans Affairs is able to negotiate discounts of 50 percent or more, far larger than those the Medicare actuary expects the elderly to receive under the new plan.
- more -
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/05/06/opinion/06krugman.html
By PAUL KRUGMAN
There was a brief flurry of outrage when Congress passed the 2003 Medicare bill. The news media reported on the scandalous vote in the House of Representatives: Republican leaders violated parliamentary procedure, twisted arms and perhaps engaged in bribery to persuade skeptical lawmakers to change their votes in a session literally held in the dead of night.
Later, the media reported on another scandal: it turned out that the administration had deceived Congress about the bill's likely cost.
But the real scandal is what's in the legislation. It's an object lesson in how special interests hold America's health care system hostage.
The new Medicare law subsidizes private health plans, which have repeatedly failed to deliver promised cost savings. It creates an unnecessary layer of middlemen by requiring that the drug benefit be administered by private insurers. The biggest giveaway is to Big Pharma: the law specifically prohibits Medicare from using its purchasing power to negotiate lower drug prices.
Outside the United States, almost every government bargains over drug prices. And it works: the Congressional Budget Office says that foreign drug prices are 35 to 55 percent below U.S. levels. Even within the United States, Veterans Affairs is able to negotiate discounts of 50 percent or more, far larger than those the Medicare actuary expects the elderly to receive under the new plan.
- more -
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/05/06/opinion/06krugman.html
I wish I could offer some advice. Here's a chart about drug prices.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/10022586434
The best to your Mom.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
107 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
A hideous example of the state of 'health care' in AmeriKa (GOD DAMN this shit) [View all]
Triana
Jul 2013
OP
You are correct. It dropped from 100% patient responsibility to 50% (now 47.5) for brands
cbayer
Jul 2013
#4
I stand corrected. I knew there had been changes but didn't realize that they were
cbayer
Jul 2013
#9
Could she possibly get a credit card through a credit union that would allow it?
Fuddnik
Jul 2013
#8
Many credit cards will now put a hold on a big charge that comes out of the blue until you call them
Brickbat
Jul 2013
#12
Oh they'll take a check. But last time a credit card was fine. Now, they're telling her
Triana
Jul 2013
#17
What med is it, if you can say. I've an address for very cheap diabetes supplies, in FL.
truedelphi
Jul 2013
#28
Ah, Triana. Yes, this is the kind of goat rope that kills people. I'm so sorry for her. It's wrong!
freshwest
Jul 2013
#20
That's what Mom believes too and I think she's right...they're fighting tooth & nail
Triana
Jul 2013
#39
This is what happens when the banks and the pharmaceutical industry rule the nation.
Enthusiast
Jul 2013
#54