Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BeyondGeography

(40,792 posts)
68. Oh I know, you grew up down there and know the darker meaning of everything
Fri Jul 5, 2013, 11:18 AM
Jul 2013

we say and do. Have it all figured out, right down to the day Amerikkka will become a shriveled husk of nothing.

Tiresome.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Would that so-called Democrats would be a bit less nasty to their own President.... nt MADem Jul 2013 #1
Not something I'm engaging in. I criticize policies and focus on them cali Jul 2013 #3
It's responsive--it's the other side of that coin. MADem Jul 2013 #16
fine. I have no problem condemning comments that degrade the President. cali Jul 2013 #23
I don't play silly tit for tat games, I simply point out hypocrisies. MADem Jul 2013 #29
Bullshit. zeemike Jul 2013 #38
+1 and cali Jul 2013 #45
Someone actually said that and MuseRider Jul 2013 #82
Please Don't! cali Jul 2013 #86
I say this a lot anymore MuseRider Jul 2013 #95
The only thing that has changed is that the "mods" aren't cleaning up the mess and making MADem Jul 2013 #115
Well, let's see.... MADem Jul 2013 #72
right. hip hip hooray for ugly comments. fuck south america. this is cali Jul 2013 #89
Way to completely miss the point I was advancing. MADem Jul 2013 #121
it is YOU who misses CALI's point. AmBlue Jul 2013 #137
Oh please. Dial it down five notches. No plane was forced down. MADem Jul 2013 #141
Okay... you go on gushing about our emperor's fine suit of silk. AmBlue Jul 2013 #144
Listen to you, talking about "our emperor" on a Democratic message board! MADem Jul 2013 #147
Ever heard of an analogy? AmBlue Jul 2013 #152
Yes, good idea--no need to let anything that doesn't match your world view disturb your MADem Jul 2013 #153
Well to paraphrase a quote of a famous person zeemike Jul 2013 #90
Look, I'm not the one calling anyone a tin pot dictator, even though there MADem Jul 2013 #93
Well you do realize that Morales and Chavez were both elected in a democratic election don;t you? zeemike Jul 2013 #96
I realize that Chavez changed the rules to retain power, and Morales did as well. MADem Jul 2013 #99
You mean like the GOP changed the rules zeemike Jul 2013 #104
Oh, the "they did it too" excuse? Really? And you go back over MADem Jul 2013 #107
That was not my point at all. zeemike Jul 2013 #119
Whenever it's changed to give the SAME GUY continued power, I look askance. MADem Jul 2013 #123
I don't know what TMI is zeemike Jul 2013 #129
Too much information. It's a rather standard phrase. MADem Jul 2013 #142
The phrase I know zeemike Jul 2013 #145
No one is trying to discredit you. MADem Jul 2013 #146
Well I have never been given the third degree about it before zeemike Jul 2013 #149
It's not the third degree--it's simply a logical question which arose from your own assertions. nt MADem Jul 2013 #150
Which you found suspicious zeemike Jul 2013 #151
No--I simply noted that your assertion(s) didn't match your join date. MADem Jul 2013 #154
All facts that you care about. zeemike Jul 2013 #155
Does the fact that he doesn't have a Congress that will pass the laws he'd like to implement matter MADem Jul 2013 #157
Yes those facts matter to me zeemike Jul 2013 #158
+1 AmBlue Jul 2013 #138
It would be helpful in furthering the discussion on this site dgibby Jul 2013 #118
Yes, and it would also be nice if people could disagree "honestly" without using personal MADem Jul 2013 #124
Why do you even bother?? THESE PEOPLE SEE WHAT THEY WANT TO SEE Number23 Jul 2013 #134
Yes indeed. MADem Jul 2013 #156
"our first black POTUS" magellan Jul 2013 #106
Not make exceptions--just give him the same damn consideration. MADem Jul 2013 #108
I hold him to the same standards I hold any president. magellan Jul 2013 #110
If the shoe does not fit you, don't cram it on your foot and then pout at me about it. MADem Jul 2013 #111
Just reading through this thread, as I do before deciding to comment magellan Jul 2013 #112
That struck me too. Stands out like a sore thumb. n/t dgibby Jul 2013 #113
Just as it stands out like a sore thumb when he's treated differently by posters here. nt MADem Jul 2013 #127
I see distress over Pres. Obama's POLICIES, not the person Mojorabbit Jul 2013 #133
Really, I haven't seen anyone trying to bring some facts to this conversation denigrating the Cleita Jul 2013 #47
Give us this day our daily bread--when does a week go by that someone isn't MADem Jul 2013 #101
If that's what is happening to you maybe you need to update your ignore list. Cleita Jul 2013 #128
I don't do ignore. I just don't see the point of it. MADem Jul 2013 #148
It's good to see you are condemning that kind of ugliness, which I'm sure you are sabrina 1 Jul 2013 #163
Morales is loving the publicity--can't you tell? This is the best thing that ever could have MADem Jul 2013 #166
You didn't answer the question, but so be it, I will draw my own conclusions. sabrina 1 Jul 2013 #168
It's good to see you are condemning that kind of ugliness, which I'm sure you are sabrina 1 Jul 2013 #163
When criticism of the issue is interpreted as criticism of the person Pholus Jul 2013 #5
When criticism of the person gets denigrating and insulting, issues get pushed to the background. MADem Jul 2013 #14
Get thee hence to the rest of DU sibelian Jul 2013 #24
I cannot improve on this. Pholus Jul 2013 #28
+1 cali Jul 2013 #31
Young padawan...? MADem Jul 2013 #32
Psssst....some kids just walked on your lawn while you were busy hating on Harry Potter. DisgustipatedinCA Jul 2013 #135
I don't "hate" Harry Potter one bit. MADem Jul 2013 #140
I'm 44 and looking in both directions DisgustipatedinCA Jul 2013 #143
Well, I'm considerably older than you. You could be my kid. MADem Jul 2013 #180
+1 LWolf Jul 2013 #37
Well said and exactly Bluenorthwest Jul 2013 #39
+1 truebluegreen Jul 2013 #41
But it was okay to insult and denigrate Bush, right? kurtzapril4 Jul 2013 #43
Well that's where American Exceptualizm steps in ...but we're not going to start denigrating Satan! L0oniX Jul 2013 #56
Are you unclear as to the TOS of this website? MADem Jul 2013 #91
Not. At. All. Pholus Jul 2013 #102
You're trying to create a false construct, that suggests that anyone who MADem Jul 2013 #109
No different than the "Snowden, Snowden, Snowden" construct. Pholus Jul 2013 #114
Snowden's girlfriend is a key to the man. MADem Jul 2013 #126
Repeat: the man is not relevant. Pholus Jul 2013 #132
He's entirely relevant. You are ready and willing to believe everything he says, without evidence. MADem Jul 2013 #139
And you are conflating Pholus Jul 2013 #159
No, I'm not. MADem Jul 2013 #160
yes you are Pholus Jul 2013 #161
Well, we can play that game all day, but I'll just refer you back to my last post. nt MADem Jul 2013 #162
cool we are done. post 159 has the main point. Pholus Jul 2013 #169
"Unamerican" secrets-BAD. "Unrussian" secrets, or "Unchinese" secrets--good? MADem Jul 2013 #172
Hey the only reason national dragnets are secrets Pholus Jul 2013 #174
Whatever that word salad means..."LOL" ... nt MADem Jul 2013 #181
Huh. Seemed simple enough. But reading standards ARE in decline. Pholus Jul 2013 #191
Well, that's not true at all. MADem Jul 2013 #192
You may find this difficult to believe, dgibby Jul 2013 #120
How nice for you and those like you. Perhaps you can exhort the Hate Obama First Club to MADem Jul 2013 #122
Are you unclear about the Democratic Party's promises to those who voted for them? sabrina 1 Jul 2013 #170
You can't do shit without Congress. I guess that's a concept that is tough for you to grasp? MADem Jul 2013 #171
Why are you always so angry? And so very wrong? Anger blinds people. It makes them sabrina 1 Jul 2013 #175
Check your mirror. I am not angry. I'm very mellow, in fact. Quite content, today, especially. MADem Jul 2013 #178
Ooooh, 'it's noticed'. Really, by whom? The NSA? Shouldn't they be looking for sabrina 1 Jul 2013 #185
By whom? By ME. MADem Jul 2013 #186
Again you are wrong . I am not only willing to admit my 'bias' as you call it, I am sabrina 1 Jul 2013 #187
Again, you don't understand that CONGRESS gatekeeps who gets into the Cabinet, apparently. MADem Jul 2013 #189
"Issues get pushed to the background" AgingAmerican Jul 2013 #83
I think it might be on you.... nt MADem Jul 2013 #88
There are those that would be nasty, but the problem is that those defending the Pres rhett o rick Jul 2013 #33
Sort of like the disruptors running around calling anyone who has a problem MADem Jul 2013 #87
Whistle-blower character assassinations are typical authoritarian behavior. rhett o rick Jul 2013 #92
Because.... you say so? MADem Jul 2013 #94
"Valid critique"? I might agree that you might provide valid critiques but most of what I have rhett o rick Jul 2013 #98
You 'don't care' that Snowden hasn't proven his case. It sounds good, so that's MADem Jul 2013 #105
It is no longer Snowden's job to "prove" anything. I want pres Obama to prove that he is looking rhett o rick Jul 2013 #130
You want simple answers to complex issues, and you aren't going to get them. MADem Jul 2013 #131
First post, thread is disrupted by another irrelevant Obama comment. Everything is about Obama. nt Zorra Jul 2013 #165
Only if you think the leader of all Americans--including the ugly ones named in the OP, MADem Jul 2013 #167
Thanks for validating my point. No. It is not about Obama. Zorra Jul 2013 #173
Not sure how I "validated" your "point." I simply pointed out that Obama is the President of all MADem Jul 2013 #176
What in the hell are you talking about? I'm outta here, this is Zorra Jul 2013 #184
The President ... or his policies? RC Jul 2013 #177
Give him the Congress, and he'll give you the policies. MADem Jul 2013 #179
Where is Obama's bully pulpit? RC Jul 2013 #182
Because they can get CONFIRMED, that's why. MADem Jul 2013 #183
Right? CakeGrrl Jul 2013 #188
Day-um....! nt MADem Jul 2013 #190
And it's possible for John Kerry to say "backyard" without being just another gringo imperialist BeyondGeography Jul 2013 #2
Actually, it's really not Scootaloo Jul 2013 #4
Very true - there's a lot of difference between "our neighborhood" and "our backyard" muriel_volestrangler Jul 2013 #7
you said it far better than I did. that's exactly it. cali Jul 2013 #8
That's absurd. ProSense Jul 2013 #17
Context, Pro, context. cali Jul 2013 #20
No ProSense Jul 2013 #22
lol. my but that's as lame as could possibly be in the face cali Jul 2013 #25
You know, ProSense Jul 2013 #26
no, just stating the obvious. As I said, I posted evidence and you did not, old Pro. cali Jul 2013 #30
You don't really want to start a link war do ya? L0oniX Jul 2013 #58
Cali is right Prosense. iemitsu Jul 2013 #57
Now you've done it. You are not of the body! L0oniX Jul 2013 #61
:) I'm not sure that this phantom is iemitsu Jul 2013 #63
Absolute nonsense. ProSense Jul 2013 #78
good reframe! good job! nt galileoreloaded Jul 2013 #103
You're putting it on display with this post, I'm afraid Scootaloo Jul 2013 #116
You probably haven't noticed but in diplomatic circles, words are chosen very carefully. DisgustipatedinCA Jul 2013 #136
Most Americans are in blissful ignorance of what our country has become. rhett o rick Jul 2013 #34
+1 zeemike Jul 2013 #44
You forgot to mention the depleted uranium that we iemitsu Jul 2013 #59
Yes, that's true. Quite a legacy. nm rhett o rick Jul 2013 #84
+1 leftstreet Jul 2013 #64
He could have chosen his words more carefully, no? cali Jul 2013 #6
It was a faux pas, it shouldn't be a death sentence for Kerry in the region BeyondGeography Jul 2013 #10
I agree with that. I don't think there was any malicious intent cali Jul 2013 #13
I actually agree with you on this one. arely staircase Jul 2013 #27
both a phrase and a pov cali Jul 2013 #35
agreed. I actually pointed the arrogance of the phrase out to a friend of mine years ago arely staircase Jul 2013 #36
Get familiar with the Monroe Doctrine nadinbrzezinski Jul 2013 #60
And I don't expect CT's to think clearly about much BeyondGeography Jul 2013 #62
It is a conspiracy theory to speak of the Monroe doctrine? nadinbrzezinski Jul 2013 #65
Oh I know, you grew up down there and know the darker meaning of everything BeyondGeography Jul 2013 #68
You are proud of your ignorance Sir nadinbrzezinski Jul 2013 #70
When it comes to sovereign nations treestar Jul 2013 #76
Perhaps the reason there are no countries willing to take Snowden dgibby Jul 2013 #125
Yeah. ananda Jul 2013 #9
I love you first thing in the morning Cali Thank you. Catherina Jul 2013 #11
right back at you, my friend cali Jul 2013 #15
Thanks to both of you. nm rhett o rick Jul 2013 #55
There was a post yesterday that dropped as low as making comments about Morales' hairstyle. idwiyo Jul 2013 #12
They have nothing to give but the ROFL emoticon. That's their total rhett o rick Jul 2013 #48
I just had a look at the thread Pic Of The Moment: Restore The Fourth, amusing to see what usernames idwiyo Jul 2013 #51
The emoticon in place of content does define them, and that ROFL emoticon is Bluenorthwest Jul 2013 #52
and another slimy post just now doing that and worse. cali Jul 2013 #66
Can you please PM me a link to that? idwiyo Jul 2013 #97
did someone really say that about the cyst? Enrique Jul 2013 #18
yes. cali Jul 2013 #21
Could you please post the jury comments? QC Jul 2013 #40
they weren't. they were almost all posted without comment, but here: cali Jul 2013 #50
that's the kind of post I'm glad is allowed to stand Enrique Jul 2013 #53
I'm not. you can always hit 'show post' cali Jul 2013 #54
You can still see that douchebag reply. It's been left intact. nt Guy Whitey Corngood Jul 2013 #42
k/r marmar Jul 2013 #19
Yes but it is a cyst of our own making. nineteen50 Jul 2013 #46
I don't know enough about HappyMe Jul 2013 #49
first ban all negative name calling of our president on DU Pretzel_Warrior Jul 2013 #67
Won't call him names nadinbrzezinski Jul 2013 #69
Bully is a name. And he has been called that on here Pretzel_Warrior Jul 2013 #71
Don't read foreign press. nadinbrzezinski Jul 2013 #74
do editorial pages inform? Or try to persuade? Pretzel_Warrior Jul 2013 #75
Well even straight reporting is all but nice nadinbrzezinski Jul 2013 #80
Bully? You actually think calling the President a bully should be cali Jul 2013 #77
no. I said such name calling should be banned--not the poster Pretzel_Warrior Jul 2013 #79
so, you're saying that a post calling the President a bully should be hidden? cali Jul 2013 #85
This is true treestar Jul 2013 #81
could you please link to some of these examples of negative name calling? cali Jul 2013 #73
You cannot expect much from trolls imo. Rex Jul 2013 #100
Name the person/thing du jour that's "making Obama look bad" magellan Jul 2013 #117
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Sliding into the prototyp...»Reply #68