Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: The image they chose of Morales was also manipulation and yellow journalism [View all]Peregrine Took
(7,583 posts)107. Absolutely! I've read that they deliberately select photo's that visually portray
their target in the worst possible or most foolish light. Often you will see right wingnut sites show photos of HRC with her mouth agape or an upward closeup shot of her face to show the most lines or an unflattering sideways shot.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
119 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
The image they chose of Morales was also manipulation and yellow journalism [View all]
Bonobo
Jul 2013
OP
The right wing rag that chose the photo. I thought you would want to know something
sabrina 1
Jul 2013
#48
Don't you ever get tired of being wrong? We democrats here became familiar with right wing
sabrina 1
Jul 2013
#68
Happy to let you know when you are accidentally cheering on right wing sources and save you the
sabrina 1
Jul 2013
#72
They are those that side with the corp-media, side with Republicans like Clapper, Mueller and Alexan
rhett o rick
Jul 2013
#113
At least one poster here on du, an enthusiastic supporter of authoritarianism.
Warren Stupidity
Jul 2013
#111
you mean the post pointing out Morales went all tin-foil about Chavez getting cancer from the CIA?
KittyWampus
Jul 2013
#65
You always forget your sarcasm tags! As a result you are creating what has to be a false
sabrina 1
Jul 2013
#31
That thread was disgusting. You know your shit is beyond foul and crazy when you only get 5 recs
Number23
Jul 2013
#114
Oh, don't you worry, this 'yella aggression' WILL stand, as the Wikileaks cables revealed,
sabrina 1
Jul 2013
#38
No problem. I guess we do assume a lot and should consider that not everyone is filled in
sabrina 1
Jul 2013
#109
I agree totally... The Duer in question responded to my comment of an "ugly undertone"
hlthe2b
Jul 2013
#14
Agree. While there is absolutely nothing wrong with any of the pictures, using the last one
idwiyo
Jul 2013
#16
Yes, I thanked the OP for that link...the post you're responding to preceded it
alcibiades_mystery
Jul 2013
#88
The right wing rag in question. Did you know that the US spends millions of our tax dollars
sabrina 1
Jul 2013
#44
Thanks. The Atlantic has now lost all credibility, right down there with Townhall. nt
Zorra
Jul 2013
#23
Yep, but let's face it, there's very little journalism in the mainstream media that isn't
Cleita
Jul 2013
#58
The OP is so fucked I don't where to begin. What exactly is wrong with the pix used?
KittyWampus
Jul 2013
#71
OMFG. I forgot about the … Elms. When DU moved to DU v.3 I left for a long time
KittyWampus
Jul 2013
#94
Neither you, the OP or anyone STILL can't explain what's wrong with the pix. And I know what yellow
KittyWampus
Jul 2013
#95
Well, he'll have to get one of his buds to give you an answer. He got locked out of his own thread
Number23
Jul 2013
#115
How does he look silly? My initial response to the pix 2 days ago was "he has a nice face".
KittyWampus
Jul 2013
#96
Absolutely! I've read that they deliberately select photo's that visually portray
Peregrine Took
Jul 2013
#107