General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: What the hell, DU? [View all]DirkGently
(12,151 posts)You tried to suggest that the smear tactics against Snowden must be accompanied by an affirmative denial that there is any significance to complaints about NSA spying.
But no one thinks that. Because that's not how smear tactics work. The smears are an attempt to hijack the topic and undermine the message *without* addressing it. That's how bad-faith, cowardly argument works.
No one needs to say, "Snowden's a dirty, pole-dancer dating, garage-box-having traitor, THEREFORE, NSA spying doesn't matter. It's implied that the message isn't credible because the messenger is unreliable.
And it would sound really stupid if they acknowledged it.
It would be relevant to show people smearing Snowden and acknowledging the overall issue, but that's not really happening.
But you can't, apparently.
I do see a few of those people now backing off a bit, but holding tight to the idea that it's far more important that Snowden broke the rules and embarrassed the administration.