Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Ichingcarpenter

(36,988 posts)
13. Why Not Hitler? He was anti union
Sat Jul 6, 2013, 12:59 PM
Jul 2013

and good for large corporations?

Also did well with meta data through the help of IBM.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Dear WSJ: fuck you. nt Deep13 Jul 2013 #1
I read another article about this earlier that said magellan Jul 2013 #2
It's the "free-market reformers" part the WSJ would really like to see starroute Jul 2013 #3
Yep, I posted in another thread about this... socialist_n_TN Jul 2013 #4
I heard Robert Bauvall speak the other day Ichingcarpenter Jul 2013 #8
That was way over the top. Enthusiast Jul 2013 #20
Still blowing Uncle Miltie. GeorgeGist Jul 2013 #5
Nobody stopped Pinochet's plane. Octafish Jul 2013 #6
Editorial SamKnause Jul 2013 #7
About what you'd expect from the Wall Street Urinal these days. The Velveteen Ocelot Jul 2013 #9
Wall Street Journal and Pinochet PaulNyden Jul 2013 #10
Welcome to DU and agree with all you said suffragette Jul 2013 #23
The coup was more about the neo-liberal agenda than anything else malaise Jul 2013 #11
That is some seriously sick shit. arcane1 Jul 2013 #12
Why Not Hitler? He was anti union Ichingcarpenter Jul 2013 #13
Really. I am surprised they did not suggest that. Safetykitten Jul 2013 #14
Chilling colsohlibgal Jul 2013 #15
WSJ editorial policy always stank. The 2007 News Corp takeover can't have helped matters struggle4progress Jul 2013 #16
Whaddaya expect when Rupert Murdoch runs the WSJ ? zbdent Jul 2013 #17
"would be lucky"? WTF! Just like the Guatemalans under Rios Montt right? Catherina Jul 2013 #18
For chrissakes! Is this how low the WSJ has sunk since uncle Cleita Jul 2013 #19
what a load of bull. Typical Ayn Rand and Rupert Murdoch Pretzel_Warrior Jul 2013 #21
Well... bobclark86 Jul 2013 #22
are you fucking kidding me? dionysus Jul 2013 #24
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Wall Street Journal says ...»Reply #13