Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Is the wealth the 1% made from destroying our jobs and moving them offshore rightfully theirs? [View all]RainDog
(28,784 posts)38. It's a quote from this link
http://www.thebaffler.com/past/practical_utopians_guide
...which is already an OP here: http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=3182592
here are a few more words from that article -
Have you ever read Marjorie Kelly's book, The Divine Right of Capital? Really great read from a business person's perspective.
more good quotes here - http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Divine_Right_of_Capital
Democracy
Major public corporations have evolved into something new in civilization, structures more massive, more dominant in the world than our democratic forefathers dreamed possible. They left us little guidance on governing these institutions - the word "corporation" appears nowhere in the Constitution - because only a handful of American corporations existed when that seminal document was written. Washington and Jefferson governed a nation of farmers, in which most nonagricultural businesses were indeed "private," run out of the parlor, or in the barn, as part of the private household.
Profits
In the current narrative of the corporation, it works like this: A corporation exists to generate profit. Profit belongs to stockholders, but they leave part of it in the corporation to fund growth. So a portion (about a third) is paid out as dividends, and the rest is kept as retained earnings. Those earnings are generated by the income statement, and retained on the balance sheet, where they are added to shareholder equity. Equity is what stockholders initially contributed when they purchased shares from the company. And by the magical closed loop of accounting, equity grows, year after year, while stockholders never contribute another cent out of their pocket.
Ergo- Stockholders "create wealth" without lifting a finger.
We call this "return on equity," or ROE. It is designed to continue into infinity.
...which is already an OP here: http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=3182592
here are a few more words from that article -
The ironies are endless. While the new free market ideology has framed itself above all as a rejection of bureaucracy, it has, in fact, been responsible for the first administrative system that has operated on a planetary scale, with its endless layering of public and private bureaucracies: the IMF, World Bank, WTO, trade organizations, financial institutions, transnational corporations, NGOs. This is precisely the system that has imposed free market orthodoxy, and opened the world to financial pillage, under the watchful aegis of American arms. It only made sense that the first attempt to recreate a global revolutionary movement, the Global Justice Movement that peaked between 1998 and 2003, was effectively a rebellion against the rule of that very planetary bureaucracy.
Future Stop
In retrospect, though, I think that later historians will conclude that the legacy of the sixties revolution was deeper than we now imagine, and that the triumph of capitalist markets and their various planetary administrators and enforcerswhich seemed so epochal and permanent in the wake of the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991was, in fact, far shallower.
Future Stop
In retrospect, though, I think that later historians will conclude that the legacy of the sixties revolution was deeper than we now imagine, and that the triumph of capitalist markets and their various planetary administrators and enforcerswhich seemed so epochal and permanent in the wake of the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991was, in fact, far shallower.
Have you ever read Marjorie Kelly's book, The Divine Right of Capital? Really great read from a business person's perspective.
more good quotes here - http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Divine_Right_of_Capital
Democracy
Major public corporations have evolved into something new in civilization, structures more massive, more dominant in the world than our democratic forefathers dreamed possible. They left us little guidance on governing these institutions - the word "corporation" appears nowhere in the Constitution - because only a handful of American corporations existed when that seminal document was written. Washington and Jefferson governed a nation of farmers, in which most nonagricultural businesses were indeed "private," run out of the parlor, or in the barn, as part of the private household.
Profits
In the current narrative of the corporation, it works like this: A corporation exists to generate profit. Profit belongs to stockholders, but they leave part of it in the corporation to fund growth. So a portion (about a third) is paid out as dividends, and the rest is kept as retained earnings. Those earnings are generated by the income statement, and retained on the balance sheet, where they are added to shareholder equity. Equity is what stockholders initially contributed when they purchased shares from the company. And by the magical closed loop of accounting, equity grows, year after year, while stockholders never contribute another cent out of their pocket.
Ergo- Stockholders "create wealth" without lifting a finger.
We call this "return on equity," or ROE. It is designed to continue into infinity.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
47 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Is the wealth the 1% made from destroying our jobs and moving them offshore rightfully theirs? [View all]
reformist2
Jul 2013
OP
The Answer Is No - As To People, How Many Honestly Think Versus Parrot Their Masters
cantbeserious
Jul 2013
#4
I think we should tax it at a top rate of 90%, like we did under Eisenhower. nt
SunSeeker
Jul 2013
#12
No. They raid and capture social welfare, while externalizing costs and paying no taxes.
on point
Jul 2013
#15
No. It's a sociopathic crime and their gains are tainted by their culture of corruption.
byeya
Jul 2013
#16