General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Time for me to say goodbye to DU. Wish you all well It isn't for me anymore /nt [View all]Benton D Struckcheon
(2,347 posts)The problem with the Internet is the same as in politics in real life: the extremists can always point at the saner folks and accuse them of not being truly, well, whatever. Over on the right that results in the Tea Party; over here it's the Chavez and now the Snowden cult, populated by mostly the same people. It's the left wing version of waving the flag and demanding loyalty, hence the lack of facts and the use of ridiculous hyperbole and appeals to emotion and authority, all of which are meant to get around having to argue the actual facts. Eventually the extremists take over. It happens over and over again on forums I've been to. Other forums I go to aren't related to politics, so the extremism of the politics winds up being confined mostly to the politics section of those forums, where over time that section will wind up dominated by one or the other side of the debate, and then after that drift towards ever more extreme versions of that.
This is a politics forum, so here the extremists are everywhere. It's a tough dynamic to get control of once it gets going, and liberals are always at a disadvantage no matter which version of extremism is being advanced since by its nature liberalism is based on advancing facts rather than ideology, and advancing justice in the face of ideology when necessary.
One excellent example from the Latin America group: I have taken careful note that, for instance, using Human Rights Watch as a source is just jim-dandy if you're talking about Guatemala, but makes you a neocon dupe if you're talking about Venezuela. Ideology, for an extremist, trumps facts, always.