General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: What the hell, DU? [View all]SunSeeker
(58,424 posts)The adequacy of the FISA court is worthy of debate. And I am sure the President could find someone better than Clapper and Mueller, certainly people that would make me and other progressives a lot happier. But that is not the subject of the OP. The title of the OP is "What the hell, DU"--by a self-described "lurker" who claims DUers believe that the private security industry and Guantanamo Bay are "all alright, because Glenn Greenwald and Edward Snowden are libertarians."
I don't know of a single DU post that says that. I think every single DUer comment I have seen on the subject indicated they have a problem with the privatization of our national security. And I think every single DUer comment I have seen on the subject indicated they have a problem with Guantanamo Bay. And no one thinks either one is "all right because Greenwald and Snowden are libertarians."
The post I was directly responding to, and who has yet to provide a link, claims DUers saying illegal surveillance "isn't problematic." As I told the poster, I can find plenty of posts pointing out the many things Snowden did wrong, but none that say therefore domestic spying is fine. It is a smear on fellow DUers that has no basis in fact.
Why is it so hard to fathom that progressive DUers can think Snowden did some things wrong AND think at the same time that the privatization of our national security is a problem? I've found that most progressives are pretty smart. We really can chew gum and walk at the same time.