General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Irony of ironies: The Ron Paul Libertarian's one way out is the "land of Chavez and Bolivar" [View all]HumansAndResources
(229 posts)Last I checked, Ron Paul spoke positively of Snowden, and opposed the Patriot Act when he was a Congressman. Ron Paul is not a part-time civil-libertarian (i.e. only when his party isn't in power), and has a voting-record to prove it.
It is his economic conclusions / policies which are the problem.
My screen-name is about the root of that problem - shared to a large extent by the left and the right - where "humans" are treated as "resources" to be "traded in a market" (right wing) or "managed like a herd by bureaucrats" (left-wing) - instead of "people" with a sovereign right to live without "serving" the wishes of a billionaire's-board or government-committee.
I am perceived as "left-leaning" because I recognize that Socialist-Sweden is a hell of a lot better than Capitalist-Indonesia (which drives the AnCaps and Libertarians up the wall) - though I would prefer actual "freedom" to either.