General Discussion

cali

(114,904 posts)

18. are you kidding? Just yikes. It says nothing of the sort in the article. duh.

Reply to randome (Reply #14)

Sun Jul 7, 2013, 10:06 AM

Jul 2013

A judgement is made as to who is a leaker.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

47 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Rarely used Espionage Act invoked seven times in five years, more than all presidents combined [View all] East Coast Pirate Jul 2013 OP

I guess they didn't listen?? kentuck Jul 2013 #1

And With PRISM Any Of Us Could Be Next cantbeserious Jul 2013 #2

Snowden is a leaker, not a whistleblower, as pointed out in the article. randome Jul 2013 #3

You know this for a fact? East Coast Pirate Jul 2013 #4

Wow. It's fewer than I thought. Six as of last year. And now Snowden makes seven. randome Jul 2013 #6

What is that assessment based on? TheKentuckian Jul 2013 #5

I did not mean in all of history. I meant the off-repeated assertion that Obama is different. randome Jul 2013 #7

As Clinton once said.. dotymed Jul 2013 #16

Really? How the hell would YOU know there are more leakers? cali Jul 2013 #12

Actually, it says that right in the article. randome Jul 2013 #14

are you kidding? Just yikes. It says nothing of the sort in the article. duh. cali Jul 2013 #18

So you think they're calling someone a leaker who steals paperclips? randome Jul 2013 #20

you're getting sillier and sillier. Of course, I said nothing of the sort cali Jul 2013 #22

This poster's whole purpose is to catapult the propaganda rusty fender Jul 2013 #28

Of course you can. TM99 Jul 2013 #25

And you think these guys are whistleblowers. randome Jul 2013 #35

I am so impressed at how fast you are to get into these threads. And Snowden IS a sabrina 1 Jul 2013 #31

Wake. Up. Wake. Up. DeSwiss Jul 2013 #8

I trust our President. Conium Jul 2013 #9

.... DeSwiss Jul 2013 #10

That pretty much sums it up. hobbit709 Jul 2013 #11

When people buy into this perception, they give up.. mountain grammy Jul 2013 #21

I see both as extremely dangerous. hobbit709 Jul 2013 #24

Ok, so your answer is distrust them all, not vote mountain grammy Jul 2013 #26

I didn't say not vote. hobbit709 Jul 2013 #27

Yes, this is correct. DeSwiss Jul 2013 #30

when the hell did Obama decide a thing like that? treestar Jul 2013 #39

You know, if I thought President Obama had decided mountain grammy Jul 2013 #40

I suggest you look into this further then. DeSwiss Jul 2013 #42

Then I can see you haven't read the NDAA, bvar22 Jul 2013 #46

+10000000000000000 treestar Jul 2013 #38

The paths are mislabeled. RC Jul 2013 #23

There is no right, there is no left. DeSwiss Jul 2013 #32

This is a beautiful quote by the president who would have changed everything, mountain grammy Jul 2013 #44

That's EXACTLY what I'm saying. DeSwiss Jul 2013 #45

Hey, maybe I'm wrong watoos Jul 2013 #13

This confirms my suspicions that there is a concerted effort to weaken our Democracy. Fuddnik Jul 2013 #17

+1 for the truth cali Jul 2013 #19

Its an attempt to increase distrust in government. JoePhilly Jul 2013 #29

+1 treestar Jul 2013 #37

Lots more than seven charged under act Progressive dog Jul 2013 #15

Think that says it all. Katashi_itto Jul 2013 #33

Filed under: shit somebody somewhere started spouting struggle4progress Jul 2013 #34

You're assuming Obama must agree with your definition of whistleblowers vs. leakers treestar Jul 2013 #36

I didn't write the article. East Coast Pirate Jul 2013 #41

Well then the writer of the article is assuming his/her definition is something Obama must agree wit treestar Jul 2013 #43

An enemy of the State might include any one sworn to protect and defend the Constitution indepat Jul 2013 #47