Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Ms. Toad

(38,637 posts)
114. He certainly can do something about it.
Sun Jul 7, 2013, 01:47 PM
Jul 2013

The law does not require President Obama to do these things; it (arguably) permits it. I did pay attention when I voted. President Obama, as candidate Obama, campaigned against these practices. I expect him not to engage in them regardless of what the law (arguably) permits.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Damn straight. NuclearDem Jul 2013 #1
Well said. 20score Jul 2013 #50
Got that right! suede1 Jul 2013 #2
Oh noes!!!! That would make you an atheist racist something!!!!!!!!!!! djean111 Jul 2013 #3
They still wont get it. Denial is everything to them. nm rhett o rick Jul 2013 #4
So who is "they" and "them?" mountain grammy Jul 2013 #109
Those that attack whistle-blowers and deny that there is anything wrong. rhett o rick Jul 2013 #113
And I agree, sounds reasonable to me. mountain grammy Jul 2013 #119
Sound reasonable to me. rhett o rick Jul 2013 #120
Those who refuse to stand up for the Constitutional rights of the people. sabrina 1 Jul 2013 #118
But the problem is, teabaggers think THEY are standing up for the mountain grammy Jul 2013 #121
Perfectly said, thanks nm MannyGoldstein Jul 2013 #5
Well said MuseRider Jul 2013 #6
Trouble is as it stands this is all legal madokie Jul 2013 #7
It's really not legal. I've read the PATRIOT ACT 20score Jul 2013 #8
You are lying madokie Jul 2013 #12
I wanted to edit my reply so you knew it wasn't personal, just relaying info. 20score Jul 2013 #16
Bye madokie Jul 2013 #17
K BehindTheCurtain76 Jul 2013 #65
Even if it was 100% legal tblue Jul 2013 #87
I guess the government should keep track of what we buy, too? Chef Eric Jul 2013 #38
If it's high-explosives, clearly the answer is yes... ConservativeDemocrat Jul 2013 #44
And what about books? And what about video streaming? Chef Eric Jul 2013 #47
That would be a collosal waste of money ConservativeDemocrat Jul 2013 #55
I don't care if retailers keep track of my book and movie purchases. Chef Eric Jul 2013 #61
Watch who you're dealing with. tblue Jul 2013 #88
You're probably right. Thanks. nt Chef Eric Jul 2013 #92
I am confident that the NSA collects every database then can including retail store records. GoneFishin Jul 2013 #96
Absolutely... ConservativeDemocrat Jul 2013 #110
I even am concerned about what business does with this information... cascadiance Jul 2013 #93
Well said..................... JimboBillyBubbaBob Jul 2013 #97
There is absolutely no difference between firearm and other purchases ConservativeDemocrat Jul 2013 #112
Show me. sulphurdunn Jul 2013 #39
Supposedly there is basically a "secret" Patriot Act that they follow: think Jul 2013 #52
Not only that, but the rogue Just. Dept. is calling for a full cover up Dragonfli Jul 2013 #53
Your statement is nonsensical. The phone company has the information provided to TheKentuckian Jul 2013 #56
AND on its own authority the phone co can't arrest you bread_and_roses Jul 2013 #94
We have the admission that encrypted traffic is stored for analysis. TheMadMonk Jul 2013 #75
Even if it was legal, I don't happen to think it is, but even if it was, A Simple Game Jul 2013 #11
He can't stop or start anything and if you'd been paying attention these last five years you'd see madokie Jul 2013 #14
Oh I have been paying attention, and what I see is that he doesn't want to stop it. A Simple Game Jul 2013 #21
thats easy madokie Jul 2013 #23
I didn't think you would answer any of my questions. A Simple Game Jul 2013 #24
Yes and that's why we elected Barack Obama to make all of that right or at least totodeinhere Jul 2013 #70
That's right. sulphurdunn Jul 2013 #46
Can you elaborate on the President's power when it comes to directing NSA programs? BenzoDia Jul 2013 #51
If he can't stop it why can't he at least go to the American people and say that it is wrong and totodeinhere Jul 2013 #69
One of your buds disagreed with you-said it will remain illegal. Divernan Jul 2013 #29
awesome! fascisthunter Jul 2013 #67
Bookmarked for later retrieval DisgustipatedinCA Jul 2013 #99
Every dictator and tyrant down through history... 99Forever Jul 2013 #40
WTF do you think we did in 08, and again 2012 usGovOwesUs3Trillion Jul 2013 #43
That's what they *claim*, while they block actual legal review. /nt Marr Jul 2013 #76
Knowing about it is the problem.... Spitfire of ATJ Jul 2013 #85
Read the 4th Amendment again. mbperrin Jul 2013 #104
oh, excuse me. RILib Jul 2013 #111
He certainly can do something about it. Ms. Toad Jul 2013 #114
How do you know that it's legal when we dont know the full story. rhett o rick Jul 2013 #115
My understanding is that Jesus already has a massive spying program, called ANGELS The Straight Story Jul 2013 #9
HA! That's funny! 20score Jul 2013 #10
He's even subcontracted this bulk data collection bobduca Jul 2013 #103
K&R forestpath Jul 2013 #13
I know you won't like this, buy why? treestar Jul 2013 #15
We've been discussing this for decades, even before I was born. 20score Jul 2013 #18
Have you seen the warrant? The Verizon warrant? Th1onein Jul 2013 #31
Shuuush!!! JoePhilly Jul 2013 #34
Are you trying to call us racist, again? usGovOwesUs3Trillion Jul 2013 #45
Look I'm not happy about it either. AnnieK401 Jul 2013 #19
If you're A-okay with massive spending on war, while states go broke, truedelphi Jul 2013 #30
Not OK with any of that. But not sure what banks, Monsanto, the gun lobby, AnnieK401 Jul 2013 #33
"...not sure what banks, Monsanto, the gun lobby, sulphurdunn Jul 2013 #49
What's the connection that you see. AnnieK401 Jul 2013 #54
It's quite simple really. sulphurdunn Jul 2013 #57
Thank you. truedelphi Jul 2013 #58
I see, so when does the revolution begin? AnnieK401 Jul 2013 #59
It never ended, sulphurdunn Jul 2013 #60
I actually think that's brilliant. AnnieK401 Jul 2013 #62
Tribal society is democratic society. sulphurdunn Jul 2013 #64
This message was self-deleted by its author 20score Jul 2013 #74
The problem is that the apparatus will span more than just this administration sibelian Jul 2013 #101
So you support Charles Manson then. Okay. cherokeeprogressive Jul 2013 #20
Huge K&R! Poll_Blind Jul 2013 #22
Well, for one none of them would make it as President. Lobo27 Jul 2013 #25
The birthers would have a field day with Jesus. Buzz Clik Jul 2013 #27
Cut that out!!!! I just took a sip of coffee!!!! Now it's all over the place!!!! Squinch Jul 2013 #37
Manson would have a chance jberryhill Jul 2013 #84
Jeebus does not approve of cloning. Buzz Clik Jul 2013 #26
true . But I suspect Charles Manson would have an easier time obtaining asylum than Edward Snowden Douglas Carpenter Jul 2013 #28
Charlie's treated better than Bradley Manning. tblue Jul 2013 #90
That does it. You're on the list. blkmusclmachine Jul 2013 #32
objectivity, my friend! Duppers Jul 2013 #35
Duppers, you rock! 20score Jul 2013 #41
Would that be truebluegreen Jul 2013 #105
If Jesus were President, the government wouldn't need to spy, given HardTimes99 Jul 2013 #36
well said. nashville_brook Jul 2013 #42
LOL Savannahmann Jul 2013 #48
Crystal Clear! Affirmative. Agony Jul 2013 #63
You never loved the Jesus MLK Gandhi clone. dawg Jul 2013 #66
Well, if you put it that way, I kinda suck. Sorry. 20score Jul 2013 #73
Well, if your objections are constitutional, two of the three are not qualified to be President or MADem Jul 2013 #68
Well Said - Thank You cantbeserious Jul 2013 #71
This. DeSwiss Jul 2013 #72
Thank. You. Apophis Jul 2013 #77
Yes, exactly. the Obama true believers don't seem to get this....... bowens43 Jul 2013 #78
the only way they can respond is, "they aren't?!" MisterP Jul 2013 #79
K&R. JDPriestly Jul 2013 #80
Very well-put, thanks (n/t) a2liberal Jul 2013 #81
And, of course, ProSense Jul 2013 #82
K & f-n R ~nt 99th_Monkey Jul 2013 #83
well if Santa became President hfojvt Jul 2013 #86
True. The NSA should hire him. tblue Jul 2013 #89
.... DeSwiss Jul 2013 #91
Heh heh. nt ancianita Jul 2013 #95
Ray Stevens was on to this a long time ago! mbperrin Jul 2013 #107
You'd trust Charlie Manson to be truthful over Progressive dog Jul 2013 #98
hehehe. SammyWinstonJack Jul 2013 #100
Yes, thank you. mbperrin Jul 2013 #102
Hear, hear! truebluegreen Jul 2013 #106
And even the three of them together would not be able to dismantle our surveillance culture. n/t Orsino Jul 2013 #108
K&R ReRe Jul 2013 #116
I couldn't agree more! sabrina 1 Jul 2013 #117
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»I Don’t Give a Damn if Je...»Reply #114