General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: What the hell, DU? [View all]Jim Lane
(11,175 posts)You say I'm "backpedaling" when I quoted my own original post verbatim. I stand by everything I actually wrote.
I pointed out that the vitriol directed at Snowden was far out of proportion to his importance. I opined that the reason for this barrage was to mount an indirect defense of the surveillance he exposed. I asked for an alternative explanation and pointed out that previous requests for such an explanation had been ignored. Your latest response continues to ignore it. Instead, you assert that my comment is a "smear" of other DUers. It is no smear to point out that a logical fallacy is being perpetrated.
I'm done here. Those of who you who want to obsess over the biography of some low-level NSA schlub have taken up enough of my time. You may now have the last word about Snowden and his heinous villainy. I make only one request: If your assault on him ever reaches the stage of pointing out what you contend are specific factual errors in what he has said about what the government is doing, please identify those alleged errors in a separate thread, one that is not cluttered with attacks on Snowden's views on completely unrelated issues. That way, there's more of a chance that I'll notice it.