Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Updated: Quebec Disaster: "You have to understand: there are no wounded. They’re all dead.” [View all]FarCenter
(19,429 posts)39. Video of the train on fire at Nantes
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
63 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Updated: Quebec Disaster: "You have to understand: there are no wounded. They’re all dead.” [View all]
cali
Jul 2013
OP
shit. this is so ghastly. and it could happen in so many locations, particularly in the Northeast
cali
Jul 2013
#5
K&R! This wasn't even on the news this morning! I completely missed the story, until your post!
chimpymustgo
Jul 2013
#50
If I keep kicking this, it's not only because it's a major tragedy that isn't getting much attention
cali
Jul 2013
#17
I so don't get the lack of interest here in this human, enviromental and infratructure disaster
cali
Jul 2013
#21
Thanks Cleita, but we're DUers, I'm sure we can find something to disagree about here
cali
Jul 2013
#25
Lac Megantic's survivors are asking politicians why the train had just ONE engineer...
Amonester
Jul 2013
#42
Many shorter lines have gone to one engineer instead of an engineer and a conductor to "save money."
Brickbat
Jul 2013
#49
and not the least of it is that this lovely place is polluted for some time to come.
cali
Jul 2013
#29
My first reaction to this "accident" is that it is unbelievable. But it isn't, is it?
snappyturtle
Jul 2013
#58