Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Sliding into the prototypical "Ugly American" mindset [View all]sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)185. Ooooh, 'it's noticed'. Really, by whom? The NSA? Shouldn't they be looking for
terrorists or something?
And THANK YOU for taking all that time and trouble to post my comments about Chavez. I''m impressed with myself, every word is true and without your 'noticing' I would probably not have had the pleasure of reading my own words again.
This one eg, I will post it again as I don't think I got an answer to a question so many Democrats are asking:
No, that has not been the narrative at all. He is the POTUS and does get criticism for
some of his policies, for me the most disturbing thing about this administration is the number of Republicans he has appointed to powerful positions. I don't get that at all. And that there are few to no actual Progressive Dems in his cabinet. He has favored Corporate CEOs, Bush holdovers for economic positions, and people such as Gates et al when surely we have some Democrats who are qualified to be in a Democratic Cabinety.
It's odd because if any DUer says one positive thing about Ron Paul the same people who have zero to say about the President going much further than that and returning Republicans to power after we threw them out, slam them with epithets and charges of being 'Paulites'. By that logic, the President is more than just a Comey/Ashcroftite' since he has the power to give them power and has done so.
What do you think of all these Corporate Ceos, Monsanto, Booz Allen (Clapper, Republican, CEO of Booz Allen, Director of Intel) and Republicans being in a Democratic Administration? We didn't vote for Republicans, but that is what the President is doing each time he appoints another Republican to such powerful positions.
some of his policies, for me the most disturbing thing about this administration is the number of Republicans he has appointed to powerful positions. I don't get that at all. And that there are few to no actual Progressive Dems in his cabinet. He has favored Corporate CEOs, Bush holdovers for economic positions, and people such as Gates et al when surely we have some Democrats who are qualified to be in a Democratic Cabinety.
It's odd because if any DUer says one positive thing about Ron Paul the same people who have zero to say about the President going much further than that and returning Republicans to power after we threw them out, slam them with epithets and charges of being 'Paulites'. By that logic, the President is more than just a Comey/Ashcroftite' since he has the power to give them power and has done so.
What do you think of all these Corporate Ceos, Monsanto, Booz Allen (Clapper, Republican, CEO of Booz Allen, Director of Intel) and Republicans being in a Democratic Administration? We didn't vote for Republicans, but that is what the President is doing each time he appoints another Republican to such powerful positions.
Every word a FACT. Do you have problems with facts? Can YOU answer my questions about all the REPUBLICANS in this administration?
I've read them all again, and I am very impressed with my adherence to issues rather than people, it's nice to see that despite all the personal attacks, such as YOURS to which I am responding, I manage to stay on the topic. But then I'm a Democrat, not a Freeper whose only fall back is usually to attack their opponents lacking the ability to defend their indefensible positions.
However, you failed to show anything post of mine that insulted the PRESIDENT personally, as I knew you could not. That WAS the accusation, was it not?
And I stand by and am proud of every post I made about Chavez who was a historical leader to his own people and will be remembered for what he contributed to the formation of the Latin American Alliance of Nations to ward off any more interference from the Western Imperial Powers.
Look, I'm sorry you don't like people pointing out the truth, or that people are way, way more informed than they used to be. Young people especially, free of all those ancient Cold War prejudices can see things far more clearly than the old Cold War Warriors who are still living in the past.
Btw, did you realize how often you used the pronoun 'YOU' again?
Nothing I said is false. You can't do shit without Congress, yet you're the one "getting angry" because things aren't to YOUR liking. You constantly criticize the guy about things that are TOTALLY outside his purview, like closing Gitmo,
You sound very angry to me. At me. I'm angry but not at anyone here, I am angry at what is happening in this country.
Since you failed to prove your claims, and yes, I most certainly WILL criticize policies I don't agree with, and no, he DOESN'T need to appoint Republicans to positions of power to get 'things done', gee, so what's the point of us voting for Democrats if it doesn't matter and we have to return Republicans to power to 'get things done'? What you're saying is we might as well vote for Republicans so we can get things done.
Stop with the excuses, they aren't working. I said plenty of nice things about Obama going back to 2004. I will say more nice things about him on a personal level, but I'm here to talk about POLITICS, not personalities. Just to please you though, he's a great father and husband and I think he probably really does believe that Reagan Policies are good for the country. But I disagree with him. I disagree with my brother, who I love and is also a wonderful father and husband about some things.
This is a political forum. Start a forum about personalities and I will be happy to say nice things about the President, but that has zero to do with politics and with policies.
And calm down, we've got this! Finally!
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
192 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Would that so-called Democrats would be a bit less nasty to their own President.... nt
MADem
Jul 2013
#1
The only thing that has changed is that the "mods" aren't cleaning up the mess and making
MADem
Jul 2013
#115
Yes, good idea--no need to let anything that doesn't match your world view disturb your
MADem
Jul 2013
#153
Well you do realize that Morales and Chavez were both elected in a democratic election don;t you?
zeemike
Jul 2013
#96
I realize that Chavez changed the rules to retain power, and Morales did as well.
MADem
Jul 2013
#99
It's not the third degree--it's simply a logical question which arose from your own assertions. nt
MADem
Jul 2013
#150
Does the fact that he doesn't have a Congress that will pass the laws he'd like to implement matter
MADem
Jul 2013
#157
Yes, and it would also be nice if people could disagree "honestly" without using personal
MADem
Jul 2013
#124
If the shoe does not fit you, don't cram it on your foot and then pout at me about it.
MADem
Jul 2013
#111
Just as it stands out like a sore thumb when he's treated differently by posters here. nt
MADem
Jul 2013
#127
Really, I haven't seen anyone trying to bring some facts to this conversation denigrating the
Cleita
Jul 2013
#47
It's good to see you are condemning that kind of ugliness, which I'm sure you are
sabrina 1
Jul 2013
#163
Morales is loving the publicity--can't you tell? This is the best thing that ever could have
MADem
Jul 2013
#166
You didn't answer the question, but so be it, I will draw my own conclusions.
sabrina 1
Jul 2013
#168
It's good to see you are condemning that kind of ugliness, which I'm sure you are
sabrina 1
Jul 2013
#163
When criticism of the person gets denigrating and insulting, issues get pushed to the background.
MADem
Jul 2013
#14
Psssst....some kids just walked on your lawn while you were busy hating on Harry Potter.
DisgustipatedinCA
Jul 2013
#135
Well that's where American Exceptualizm steps in ...but we're not going to start denigrating Satan!
L0oniX
Jul 2013
#56
He's entirely relevant. You are ready and willing to believe everything he says, without evidence.
MADem
Jul 2013
#139
Well, we can play that game all day, but I'll just refer you back to my last post. nt
MADem
Jul 2013
#162
How nice for you and those like you. Perhaps you can exhort the Hate Obama First Club to
MADem
Jul 2013
#122
Are you unclear about the Democratic Party's promises to those who voted for them?
sabrina 1
Jul 2013
#170
You can't do shit without Congress. I guess that's a concept that is tough for you to grasp?
MADem
Jul 2013
#171
Why are you always so angry? And so very wrong? Anger blinds people. It makes them
sabrina 1
Jul 2013
#175
Check your mirror. I am not angry. I'm very mellow, in fact. Quite content, today, especially.
MADem
Jul 2013
#178
Ooooh, 'it's noticed'. Really, by whom? The NSA? Shouldn't they be looking for
sabrina 1
Jul 2013
#185
Again you are wrong . I am not only willing to admit my 'bias' as you call it, I am
sabrina 1
Jul 2013
#187
Again, you don't understand that CONGRESS gatekeeps who gets into the Cabinet, apparently.
MADem
Jul 2013
#189
There are those that would be nasty, but the problem is that those defending the Pres
rhett o rick
Jul 2013
#33
Whistle-blower character assassinations are typical authoritarian behavior.
rhett o rick
Jul 2013
#92
"Valid critique"? I might agree that you might provide valid critiques but most of what I have
rhett o rick
Jul 2013
#98
It is no longer Snowden's job to "prove" anything. I want pres Obama to prove that he is looking
rhett o rick
Jul 2013
#130
First post, thread is disrupted by another irrelevant Obama comment. Everything is about Obama. nt
Zorra
Jul 2013
#165
Only if you think the leader of all Americans--including the ugly ones named in the OP,
MADem
Jul 2013
#167
Not sure how I "validated" your "point." I simply pointed out that Obama is the President of all
MADem
Jul 2013
#176
And it's possible for John Kerry to say "backyard" without being just another gringo imperialist
BeyondGeography
Jul 2013
#2
Very true - there's a lot of difference between "our neighborhood" and "our backyard"
muriel_volestrangler
Jul 2013
#7
no, just stating the obvious. As I said, I posted evidence and you did not, old Pro.
cali
Jul 2013
#30
You probably haven't noticed but in diplomatic circles, words are chosen very carefully.
DisgustipatedinCA
Jul 2013
#136
It was a faux pas, it shouldn't be a death sentence for Kerry in the region
BeyondGeography
Jul 2013
#10
agreed. I actually pointed the arrogance of the phrase out to a friend of mine years ago
arely staircase
Jul 2013
#36
Oh I know, you grew up down there and know the darker meaning of everything
BeyondGeography
Jul 2013
#68
There was a post yesterday that dropped as low as making comments about Morales' hairstyle.
idwiyo
Jul 2013
#12
I just had a look at the thread Pic Of The Moment: Restore The Fourth, amusing to see what usernames
idwiyo
Jul 2013
#51
The emoticon in place of content does define them, and that ROFL emoticon is
Bluenorthwest
Jul 2013
#52