General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Updated: Quebec Disaster: "You have to understand: there are no wounded. They’re all dead.” [View all]cali
(114,904 posts)<snip>
Unlike pipeline proposals, however, the escalation of rail movements of oil, including light oil shipments from the Bakken fields as well as from similar unconventional, or tight, oil deposits in Canada, is not covered by any regular government or regulatory review.
We have an explosion of tight oil production in Canada and the United States, and most of it is moving by train, said Anthony Swift, a lawyer with the Natural Resources Defense Council in Washington. But this process has happened without due diligence.
Keith Stewart, a climate and energy campaigner with Greenpeace Canada who has examined the increased use of oil trains, criticized railways in Canada and the United States for continuing to use older oil tank cars that he said were found to be unsafe more than 20 years ago.
A 2009 report by the National Transportation Safety Board about a Canadian National derailment in Illinois called the design of those tank cars inadequate and found that it made the cars subject to damage and catastrophic loss of hazardous materials. Television images suggested that the surviving tank cars on the Lac-Mégantic train were of the older design.
<snip>
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/07/08/world/americas/deadly-derailment-in-quebec-underlines-oil-debate.html?_r=0