Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Updated: Quebec Disaster: "You have to understand: there are no wounded. They’re all dead.” [View all]Sgent
(5,858 posts)55. Policy implications?
This seems to me to be a giant reason to build more pipelines -- since they are the safest method of transporting oil. From an environmental perspective, I wonder what would be worse -- occasional spills or the pipeline cutting across land.
The best solution is to stop (or reduce) our oil consumption, but assuming that its not going to go down (hopefully it won't increase), it seems to me that oil pipelines are safer and more efficient (so less pollution) in transporting...
Not an easy thing to grapple with.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
63 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Updated: Quebec Disaster: "You have to understand: there are no wounded. They’re all dead.” [View all]
cali
Jul 2013
OP
shit. this is so ghastly. and it could happen in so many locations, particularly in the Northeast
cali
Jul 2013
#5
K&R! This wasn't even on the news this morning! I completely missed the story, until your post!
chimpymustgo
Jul 2013
#50
If I keep kicking this, it's not only because it's a major tragedy that isn't getting much attention
cali
Jul 2013
#17
I so don't get the lack of interest here in this human, enviromental and infratructure disaster
cali
Jul 2013
#21
Thanks Cleita, but we're DUers, I'm sure we can find something to disagree about here
cali
Jul 2013
#25
Lac Megantic's survivors are asking politicians why the train had just ONE engineer...
Amonester
Jul 2013
#42
Many shorter lines have gone to one engineer instead of an engineer and a conductor to "save money."
Brickbat
Jul 2013
#49
and not the least of it is that this lovely place is polluted for some time to come.
cali
Jul 2013
#29
My first reaction to this "accident" is that it is unbelievable. But it isn't, is it?
snappyturtle
Jul 2013
#58