Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Aristus

(72,399 posts)
8. I'm not dehumanizing them.
Mon Jul 8, 2013, 10:43 AM
Jul 2013

Which is not to say they weren't despicable human beings.

Fighting for home and hearth is nonsense. Nobody wanted to take their home and hearth away. No one was threatening their precious "heritage". They were fighting for slavery. And the slave-owners who stood to gain the most from the blood sacrifice of backwoods illiterates used every trick in the book to convince the troops that they were fighting for anything other than slavery. "States Rights", anybody?

And it's worth pointing out, I think, that the poor non-slave-owners wanted to preserve slavery just as much as the rich planters. As long as slavery existed, the impoverished dirt farmers who did the bulk of the fighting would not be on the bottom rung of the socioeconomic ladder.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»In which Recursion rants ...»Reply #8