Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

jsmirman

(4,507 posts)
7. I would think State Constitutions/State Laws
Thu Feb 16, 2012, 08:13 PM
Feb 2012

govern this kind of situation, although I'm sure there's someone with a fuller understanding of this than I have. I do wonder if there's any clever legal way to take the thing federal, like a denial of due process to tax and then remove all say over services, etc., but my guess is that these are all state law questions. The question of how a person is governed within his or her own state, by state and local governments is for states to determine, by and large, I think, and is troubled by Federal law, the Constitution only if you can point to a specific right that you have as an American that is being denied. When it comes to matters of governance, I don't think you're likely to find federal grounds - I know part of the idea is the concept that if you don't like how a state has set its constitution/its laws, it's presumed you can move.

It is *wild* what is happening in Michigan, but I think they've got to revolt in that state. I would hope that there would be many people mobilized in Michigan for the next go round like never before.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»In Case You Missed This.....»Reply #7