Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

The one where private contractors with investors who bribe govt officials think Jul 2013 #1
Check out the history of the Hampton Roads lighthouse sometime Recursion Jul 2013 #2
A history of political bribery does not excuse it in the current day.... think Jul 2013 #3
Why would you even deflect on such an issue as bribery? think Jul 2013 #4
"Deflect"? *you're* the one who wanted to live in a time when contractors didn't bribe the gov't Recursion Jul 2013 #5
Do you feel the Carlyle Group should be allowed to own Booz Allen after bribing govt think Jul 2013 #6
I guess the question was too difficult.... think Jul 2013 #8
No I just think the question is dumb Recursion Jul 2013 #9
OK so you are fine with Carlyle Group owning Booz Allen despite the allegations. think Jul 2013 #10
I'm not sure what "fine" means in your question Recursion Jul 2013 #11
And I'm not sure if you are ok with a company involved in bribery allegations think Jul 2013 #12
I don't think allegations should deprive people of property (nt) Recursion Jul 2013 #13
Did Snowden commit a crime? Did Carlyle pay a fine? think Jul 2013 #15
Neither has had their guilt proven in court (nt) Recursion Jul 2013 #16
Thank you for replying. I appreciate it. I'm trying to make a point as you know think Jul 2013 #17
Other: the future, when we have outlawed all this paternalistic government horseshit. nt bemildred Jul 2013 #7
No offense, but stupid poll. I get it - your living depends on closeupready Jul 2013 #14
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»In terms of surveillance,...»Reply #15