Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Message auto-removed [View all]friendlyFRIEND
(94 posts)71. its ok...
I guess what I meant was just that the incident could have never happened without legal carry.
So someone needs to weigh the rights and security of gun owners would won't "oopsy" and kill someone against the threat of one who might?
A better background check sounds good too
Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
75 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Because the last two days of the trial have been pretty decisive for the defense
customerserviceguy
Jul 2013
#68
flip flop my ass. he said he didn't recognize the voice on the tape. keep trying.
spanone
Jul 2013
#10