Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
Tue Jul 9, 2013, 12:05 AM Jul 2013

Snowden Mentioned ‘Direct Access’ In Interview With The Guardian [View all]

Snowden Mentioned ‘Direct Access’ In Interview With The Guardian

Edward Snowden, the former National Security Agency contractor who leaked top secret agency documents to the media, said during an on-camera interview with The Guardian last month that the NSA's PRISM program gives the government "direct access" to major technology companies' systems.

"We've got PRISM, which is a demonstration of how the U.S. government co-opts U.S. corporate power to its own ends," Snowden said during a new portion of the interview, conducted on June 6, which The Guardian released on Monday. "Companies like Google, Facebook, Apple, Microsoft -- they all get together with the NSA, and provide the NSA direct access to the back ends of all of the systems you use to communicate, to store data, to put things in the cloud, and even just to send birthday wishes, and keep a record of your life. And they give [the] NSA direct access that they don't need to oversee, so they can't be held liable for it."

Soon after NSA documents related to PRISM and descriptions of the program appeared in The Guardian and The Washington Post, Apple, Facebook, and Google explicitly denied giving the government "direct access" to company servers. In a blog post in June, The Guardian's Glenn Greenwald said that the newspaper's original article about PRISM "did not claim that the NSA document alleging direct collection from the servers was true; we reported - accurately - that the NSA document claims that the program allows direct collection from the companies' servers."

Snowden did not mention "direct access" in the original portion of the video interview released last month, but when asked about what the phrase meant during a live chat on The Guardian's website last month, he wrote that &quot m)ore detail on how direct NSA's accesses are is coming, but in general, the reality is this: if an NSA, FBI, CIA, DIA, etc analyst has access to query raw SIGINT databases, they can enter and get results for anything they want. Phone number, email, user id, cell phone handset id (IMEI), and so on - it's all the same."


http://livewire.talkingpointsmemo.com/entry/snowden-mentioned-direct-access-in-interview-with-guardian

Here's what the Snowden videos did
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023203719

41 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
More exercises in hairsplitting -- what a waste of time. Waiting For Everyman Jul 2013 #1
You didn't even have to "waste" time posting that, but you did. n/t ProSense Jul 2013 #2
Over BehindTheCurtain76 Jul 2013 #19
It isn't hairsplitting, it's propaganda at its most nefarious. reusrename Jul 2013 #3
Yeah, TPM is evil for quoting Greenwald and Snowden. n/t ProSense Jul 2013 #7
Smart! Snowden and Greenwald are "nefarious". rofl Cha Jul 2013 #25
This corroborates Snowden's claim. OnyxCollie Jul 2013 #4
Thanks for this info Hydra Jul 2013 #12
how is it that no one has replied to your post above? grasswire Jul 2013 #13
It's becoming increasingly clear that Snowden's claims of "direct access" were TOTAL BULLSHIT Cali_Democrat Jul 2013 #5
Total Lie BehindTheCurtain76 Jul 2013 #20
One thing never mentioned is what Snowden has done to "legitimate" analysts in the field VanillaRhapsody Jul 2013 #6
They're basically robosigners. reusrename Jul 2013 #8
You say this based on what exactly? VanillaRhapsody Jul 2013 #16
No, I don't know anything about what has rained down on them. reusrename Jul 2013 #17
Thank You BehindTheCurtain76 Jul 2013 #22
You are very welcome. Try and pass this all along to interested folks. The media won't do it. reusrename Jul 2013 #23
Sock puppet BehindTheCurtain76 Jul 2013 #24
It's more like signing an affidavit. That's what the banksters needed for the mortgage theft. reusrename Jul 2013 #27
Checks and Balance BehindTheCurtain76 Jul 2013 #28
I totally agree with you about this. reusrename Jul 2013 #29
So your hero Snowden was nothing more than a "robosigner" similar to those used by mortgage co's VanillaRhapsody Jul 2013 #31
So what kind of hell is raining down on these guys? reusrename Jul 2013 #33
So you don't think that now these guys jobs are effected? VanillaRhapsody Jul 2013 #34
I've tried to figure out what you mean about their jobs being affected, but I can't. reusrename Jul 2013 #35
Sure you can....use your imagination! VanillaRhapsody Jul 2013 #36
! reusrename Jul 2013 #38
So how the hell do you know that all this Snowden guy was just a Robosigner VanillaRhapsody Jul 2013 #30
I know all this because I have been following this story closely. reusrename Jul 2013 #32
What is this? dkf Jul 2013 #9
The original story that WaPo backtracked on? n/t ProSense Jul 2013 #10
It's dated 7/6 and is about a parallel program to PRISM that goes straight to fiber optic cables. dkf Jul 2013 #15
Kick! n/t ProSense Jul 2013 #11
kicking your own thread? grasswire Jul 2013 #14
Kicking your own thread is ugly? Cali_Democrat Jul 2013 #18
Says you? It must be beautiful thing, then. Cha Jul 2013 #26
She always kicks her own threads. Hates it when they sink. n-t Logical Jul 2013 #40
K & R SunSeeker Jul 2013 #21
K & R Scurrilous Jul 2013 #37
he's a libertarian douche blathering out of his ass at this point... dionysus Jul 2013 #39
LOL, yet other countries are glad to have the information. And the ACLU. I call it a success!! n-t Logical Jul 2013 #41
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Snowden Mentioned ‘Direct...