Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

hfojvt

(37,573 posts)
6. actually scrapping the cap would not force Peterson to pay what we pay
Tue Jul 9, 2013, 01:17 AM
Jul 2013

take, for example, somebody like Mitt Romney, even though he is not nearly as rich as Peterson.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=1167192

"Romney's income $21 million, tax rate 14%
Ryan's income (wages) $153,000, tax rate - 20% (not including payroll taxes of 7.65%)

Romney makes about 65 times as much as Ryan, but still pays a lower tax rate.

And most of Romney's income - $3.3 million in interest, $4.9 million in dividends, and $12.6 million in capital gains - is made without doing one iota of actual work."

Typical of a rich person, they make much of their income from
1. interest - which pays 0% in FICA taxes regardless of the cap on WAGES
2. dividends - again 0% in FICA taxes
3. capital gains - again 0% in FICA taxes.

Except for the medicare part of FICA, which only applies to Capital gains (IIRC) over $200,000, FICA taxes are only levied on WAGES. And super-rich people like Peterson and Buffet do NOT get most of their income from wages.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Deficit hawk Pete Peterso...»Reply #6