Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

bluedigger

(17,425 posts)
10. Disaster should prompt state to examine rail regs
Tue Jul 9, 2013, 07:58 AM
Jul 2013
The runaway train was like a rolling bomb on rails.

...

Ed Burkhardt, chairman of the Montreal, Maine & Atlantic, told the Bangor Daily News on Monday that the train had been properly prepared by the crew, but when firefighters put out a small fire under the engine Friday night, after the train had been prepared for the night, the air compressor that controls the air brake was turned off, allowing the brakes to fail.

He also assured Mainers that such a crew change, where the train is allowed to be left unattended, is not permitted in the U.S.

Good thing. And now perhaps Canada will review its regulations, and agree that leaving a train with tanker cars loaded with oil or any other hazardous material unattended is not a good idea.

...

On Monday, a spokesman for the Maine Department of Transportation told Maine Public Broadcasting the state follows federal regulations regarding the transport of oil. The state should not simply abdicate its responsibility to the feds. MDOT and any other pertinent state agencies should be reviewing the federal regulations.

Let's use this terrible incident, which happened only miles from our border, as an opportunity to examine the federal regulations that govern the transportation of such materials through our state to make sure they do what's necessary to reduce the possibility of such a disaster here.

Don't assume the feds have it right; in Canada they didn't.

http://www.sunjournal.com/news/our-view/2013/07/09/disaster-should-prompt-state-examine-rail-regs/1389950

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Let us police ourselves, they said. It will be safe, they said. CaliforniaPeggy Jul 2013 #1
And then Aerows Jul 2013 #12
And I bet he has his company organized in such a way exboyfil Jul 2013 #2
The rising use of only one person operating and on these trains is a shockingly bad practice cali Jul 2013 #3
This could have all been avoided if B2G Jul 2013 #4
not enough is known yet. and honestly cali Jul 2013 #5
I understand all of that, but B2G Jul 2013 #6
maybe. I still think we don't know enough cali Jul 2013 #7
Absolutely. When you operate so a single-point failure can cause a massive tragedy... Jerry442 Jul 2013 #9
+1000 B2G Jul 2013 #11
At first glance this all looks unbelievably stupid. thucythucy Jul 2013 #13
nothing is yet established, but there's a whole lot of stupid apparently. cali Jul 2013 #14
The fire department didn't leave the train unattended pinboy3niner Jul 2013 #15
But didn't the MMA then leave the train unattended? thucythucy Jul 2013 #16
Really. Are we supposed to believe the MMA people watched the train roll silently away... Jerry442 Jul 2013 #17
I believe that the train began to roll after the MMA people left FarCenter Jul 2013 #18
The chief of the Nantes Fire Dept. (that put out the earlier locomotive fire) is worried pinboy3niner Jul 2013 #8
I don't think so, there's more to this story. MicaelS Jul 2013 #19
A technical question: Jerry442 Jul 2013 #20
Correct, a derail would have done that. MicaelS Jul 2013 #21
TY. Very informative. nt Jerry442 Jul 2013 #22
Disaster should prompt state to examine rail regs bluedigger Jul 2013 #10
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Runaway Quebec Train's Ow...»Reply #10