General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: I COMPLETELY support Snowden. [View all]Towlie
(5,580 posts)Would you condemn members of crime syndicates who break their oaths and reveal the crimes committed by those syndicates to the authorities? Would you side with the Mafia against a "stool pigeon"? Probably not, unless you were a big fan of The Sopranos.
The government has committed crimes against the people and Edward Snowden has exposed those crimes to us, in spite of any oath he may have recited to the criminals. How does that justify a completely opposite moral standard than the one you would ordinarily apply?
Another way to put things in perspective when your moral compass gets confused is to consider your feelings about a work of fiction. Think about the fictional movie plot of Clear and Present Danger. If you saw it, did you condemn Jack Ryan (Harrison Ford) for blowing the whistle on the President's illegal activities against drug cartels in South America? I didn't, and I doubt very many others saw it that way either. Jack Ryan was clearly the good guy and the President was the bad guy.
Think about what Admiral Greer (James Earl Jones) says to Jack Ryan from his hospital bed:
You took an oath, if you recall, when you first came to work for me. And I don't mean to the National Security Advisor of the United States, I mean to his boss... and I don't mean the President. You gave your word to his boss: you gave your word to the people of the United States. Your word is who you are.
Snowden may be an enemy of the state but he's a hero of the people, and it's a very bad sign when the people and the state are on opposite sides.