General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: ZIMMERMAN TRIAL: Day 11, Tuesday, July 9, 2013 [View all]Liberal_Stalwart71
(20,450 posts)...how would this animated account add to anything that Zimmerman hasn't already said on that videotape?
That's why I am beginning to think that the judge is deliberately prejudicing the case. There's absolutely no reason to admit this as evidence without further biasing the jury. It's ridiculous!
Perhaps there's a silver lining. If the animation contradicts what we've seen in that videotape from Zimmerman himself, the prosecution, if aggressive enough (doubt it), can use that to punch holes in Zimmerman's story. Not that it's necessary. Had the prosecution done an efficient job, it would have demonstrated many holes in Zimmerman's story. There are so many lies and inconsistencies already there.
Really the bottom line is the forensics. That's the only tool that the prosecution has left. They can argue that the forensics simply do not corroborate Zimmerman's many and inconsistent accounts of what happened that night.