Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

cthulu2016

(10,960 posts)
11. If you assume everything is propoganda...
Tue Jul 9, 2013, 01:23 PM
Jul 2013

There is nothing unusual about focusing a chart on the area of change. Krugman is an economist and that is how he would present the datum to a class, or in a paper or book.

The fact that folks not accustomed to charts might not read the axis is a fact.

But your identifying the perfectly proper presentation of data as "trickery" is quite silly.

And since the swing is something like 10 million Americans it is hardly a case of creating the appearance of a problem where none exists.

Also... is the objection that somebody could look at the chart and conclude that employment had dropped from 80% to 5% a sensible objection? The reality, if the chart were 1-100% on the x, would be something everyone knows did not happen.

I really have no idea how you think data should be presented, if not to be clear and usable to a person able to read a chart in the first place.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Are you brave enough to d...»Reply #11