Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

NoOneMan

(4,795 posts)
15. Yes, its awesome that he admitted humans are capable of changing their opinion due to evidence
Tue Jul 9, 2013, 02:38 PM
Jul 2013

He created a range of extremes of the time that Martin may of lived after the shot--I think he gave 3 minutes as the maximum extreme. He later was personally involved with an unusual extreme that vastly exceeded that, and therefore changed his opinion on the maximum time a human could possibly live after such a wound. This does not mean that Martin lived more than 1 minute, or even 30 seconds, but that if you shot a million humans in a similar manner, at least one could possibly live up to 10 minutes.

He also said you can't really verify this scientifically with controlled studies, as its illegal to shoot people in the heart.

Its not the best layman court answer, but its a hell of a great academic answer.

BTW, if Martin lived any time after this, why didn't Samaritan Zimmerman put his hand on the wound and apply first aid?

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»I have so dreaded the out...»Reply #15