Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: An alternative view from a “lackey butt-kissing shit” [View all]grantcart
(53,061 posts)118. Thanks for your reply
Re Border Patrol Checkpoints
There have been various detailed Supreme Court rulings that have looked at the issue in depth. Within 100 miles of the border the Border Patrol is allowed to stop and ask you questions but you are not required to answer. To conduct further investigation and searches they would have to have probable cause.
http://www.texasobserver.org/border-patrol-takes-no-for-an-answer-at-internal-checkpoints/
By email later, a Border Patrol spokesman gave me the answer I was looking for: Although motorists are not legally required to answer the questions are you a U.S. citizen and where are you headed, they will not be allowed to proceed until the inspecting agent is satisfied that the occupants of vehicles traveling through the checkpoint are legally present in the U.S.
Border Patrol agents are granted authority to question the occupants of vehicles traveling through an established checkpoint based on U.S. vs. Martinez-Fuerte. That was a 1976 Supreme Court decision that said permanent or fixed checkpoints set up by the U.S. Border patrol on public highways leading to or away from the Mexican border are not a violation of the Fourth Amendment.
You completely missed the point re FDR. The point is that there is a double standard by many DUers when it comes to critiquing Presidents. Some DUers will praise FDR in one breath and condemn "Obama's assault on the 4th amendment" in the next. There is no metric that can be applied that would put FDR ahead of Obama in terms of protecting the 4th Amendment. Over 100,000 legal residents and citizens were rounded up put in camps and their property taken. Under Obama that number is exactly 0,
Under Bush ICE conducted random neighborhood searches looking for undocumented workers and deported them by the thousands. Under Obama that practice was halted (in the San Diego Sector one ICE Agent deported a single undocumented worker and was reprimanded). I travel with my undocumented future son in law through Border Patrol Check Points and show them the card allowing for temporary permission even though he has no visa and we travel along with no fear of a knock on the door.
FDR's use of Executive Order defied rational explanation of any kind because it didn't effect Japanese living in Hawaii where there was an active spy ring but did in Arizona where there was none. Moreover we had already broken the code and were reading the cable traffic at will so the whole thing had absolutely zero strategic or tactical sense.
The point again is that among many at DU there is one standard that applies to Obama that is not applied to other Democratic Presidents. If you want to have further insight into this phenomena I invite you to the African American Group and they will fill you in.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
208 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I ws prepared for a rant and then for a looooooong rant. Well done and worth the read. I think.....
marble falls
Jul 2013
#89
The inanimate object was asking for it. You could tell by the way it looked at me.
phleshdef
Jul 2013
#69
Masturbate, Rub Face In Filth --- Interesting Set Of Options You Favor, Fella....
The Magistrate
Jul 2013
#28
If there are people who state that then it is wrong and counter productive, but
grantcart
Jul 2013
#21
Two wrongs don't make a right--and ironically, you complain about their name calling you ("hater)--
Moonwalk
Jul 2013
#35
No miss at all if others get the message. Thank you for being such a good example.
Moonwalk
Jul 2013
#132
That's a natural and very old cognitive habit that is used by either/any side to OPPRESS.
patrice
Jul 2013
#96
It's a shame that the President has put his most ardent supporters into a position where ...
dawg
Jul 2013
#22
some of which are war crimes, un constitutional and crimes against humanity..very sad indeed..nt
xiamiam
Jul 2013
#34
Unfortunately, many of our conservative defenders of an authoritarian government ...
bvar22
Jul 2013
#185
Sorry but your OP is way too long to address each point. I do find it interesting
rhett o rick
Jul 2013
#29
We must fight apathy and complacency and be vigilant. It's not paranoia to recognize
rhett o rick
Jul 2013
#81
If they're fishing through everyone's records for patterns, then everyone's under surveillance
muriel_volestrangler
Jul 2013
#61
"ask them what they believe or represent" - so why didn't he ask WillyT, instead of posting the OP?
muriel_volestrangler
Jul 2013
#68
Based on your nuanced and insightful response, no one expects you to read any books at all. Ever.
11 Bravo
Jul 2013
#79
The lexicon and manners of those who wear Obama's name like a shield speak volumes
Bluenorthwest
Jul 2013
#169
I can't imagine someone who objects to this OP being too long reading Dostoevsky or Tolstoy
stevenleser
Jul 2013
#194
Your incredible effort on the OP is appreciated - well done, and thought-provoking.
NRaleighLiberal
Jul 2013
#59
Fascist propaganda against those with whom they disagree is prejudiced & over-simplified. You can
patrice
Jul 2013
#91
There is no such thing as an absolute right. Rights are relative; that's what makes them rights.
patrice
Jul 2013
#93
Yes, a ton of assumption, conclusion jumping (me too), and petty personal attacks here
BornLooser
Jul 2013
#103
Why are we assuming that everyone on either/any side of this is exactly what they
patrice
Jul 2013
#112
My argument (that YOU avoid adressing in your Ad Hominen attack) is Basic Logic
bvar22
Jul 2013
#206
Truly, some people are comfortable with their chains and the callouses they have grown
galileoreloaded
Jul 2013
#119
Good that you aren't announcing that you're leaving. I would have given you my normal salute
bluestate10
Jul 2013
#139
That was a lovely romp! Not only do I agree with your comments, I've said most of them as well,
MADem
Jul 2013
#153
Beats the vitriolic ones for sure...and the ones that have One Cryptic Sentence as the subject line!
MADem
Jul 2013
#204
If you think this is whining about DU then first please hit the alert button
grantcart
Jul 2013
#168
I found your reply hilarious and I don't apologize if you think it is condescending
grantcart
Jul 2013
#173
"Good luck with that whole "going to change the world by posting copies of lyrics" thing."
bobduca
Jul 2013
#175
Thanks, grant. I've dropped out of the NSA threads - too high strung, reactionary,
toby jo
Jul 2013
#176
Lol excellent point. I don't think anyone was rising to the level of an epitaph.
grantcart
Jul 2013
#180