Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: TRAYVON MARTIN IS NOT ON TRIAL [View all]yardwork
(69,954 posts)66. It's a window into how Zimmerman saw Trayvon, and how the law enforcement community saw him.
To them, Trayvon Martin was a criminal because they believe that all young black males are criminals. Zimmerman and all the people supporting Zimmerman can't believe that the rest of us don't understand that Martin was dangerous.
This case has revealed to me a level of racism in this country that I had not wanted to believe.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
88 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
It shouldn't be. It's irrelevant as hell. Like bringing up the past sexual history of
Lex
Jul 2013
#4
If it is, then the prosecution should have introduced information on Zimmerman's past
sabrina 1
Jul 2013
#69
Then all the more reason to assume Zimmerman had his gun out when he confronted Martin. n/t
A Simple Game
Jul 2013
#21
So, Zimmerman was PSYCHIC, and knew that Martin had tried to buy a gun just by looking at him?
TrollBuster9090
Jul 2013
#41
is TM not afforded the right to defend himself against "Death or great bodily harm?"
frylock
Jul 2013
#42
He is too. Whoever wins is solid. Whoever can afford a gun to kill is the winner
NoOneMan
Jul 2013
#56
It's a window into how Zimmerman saw Trayvon, and how the law enforcement community saw him.
yardwork
Jul 2013
#66
ZM attacked a Policeman ,molested a woman, and beat up an ex GF? Why aren't they discussing that?
HipChick
Jul 2013
#11
To me, Zimmerman's history is highly relevant because it indicates a pattern of violent behavior.
yardwork
Jul 2013
#67
Can the prosecution now bring in Z's past as a defense rebuttal? The defence opened the door to
Maraya1969
Jul 2013
#86
Wouldn't it be weird if the judge prohibited discussion about Trayvon Martin?
Blue Bike
Jul 2013
#18
Sure, but this stuff has nothing to do with either his actions or his state of mind.
reusrename
Jul 2013
#52
Yes, the fact that the defense even came up with such a smarmy question of whether
lumpy
Jul 2013
#40
By bringing in details of Martin's character/background is the defense trying to prove that
lumpy
Jul 2013
#47
Thx. I don't usually watch it, but it was on at the gym...and I agree with you.
tofuandbeer
Jul 2013
#73
No kidding. I wonder if he'd SUCCEEDED in buying a gun, and ended up shooting Zimmerman
TrollBuster9090
Jul 2013
#38
Frankly, I'm far less worried about Zimmerman getting a reduced sentence, plead down to Manslaughter
TrollBuster9090
Jul 2013
#45
If he was going to 'plead down' to manslaughter, it would've already happened, long ago ...
brett_jv
Jul 2013
#74
Most of us believe that if Martin's private life is exposed in this court then it should be allowed
lumpy
Jul 2013
#49
Sounds like the defense is getting desparate. This new tactic is purely the defense trying to
lumpy
Jul 2013
#54
They want to jury to think that even if he didn't cause his death, he was "purgeable"
NoOneMan
Jul 2013
#55