General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: ZIMMERMAN TRIAL: Day 11, Tuesday, July 9, 2013 [View all]Just Saying
(1,799 posts)What I was saying was why should say Zimmerman's story be the narrative we start with when he's the one who killed the victim? The law in FL seems to give his story weight it frankly does not deserve and then the prosecutors have to prove a negative. "Innocent until proven guilty" is an odd standard in cases like this because we know Zimmerman killed Trayvon but the only story we get is from the killer. We know he's not innocent of killing Zimmerman but why should we have to assume it was self-defense just because Z says so? For a defense like this, the defense should have more of a burden to prove their side of the story.
I don't believe Zimmerman's version, but I think it's virtually impossible for the prosecution to prove a negative or to prove a story they simply don't know because the only one who could give another version is dead.
These laws need to be reviewed.