General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: An alternative view from a “lackey butt-kissing shit” [View all]Pholus
(4,062 posts)Yes, the Border Patrol was allowed to set up checkpoints deeper into the country than they are nominally allowed TO FIND ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS. I love people with theoretical understanding of this law talking about it. Look, just try to "not answer" at one of those checkpoints sometime and see how you're treated. Your friends might start telling you that you sound like a libertarian afterwards!
And pray tell, why then do they get to jump a drug dog up onto my truck bed to sniff around when I pass through their checkpoint? It isn't with my permission certainly. It has nothing to do with illegal immigrants. So much for the Supreme Court ruling that "A search or seizure is ordinarily unreasonable in the absence of individualized suspicion of wrongdoing (Indianapolis v. Edmond)." It's MISSION CREEP -- they got you standing there for one thing so they might as well check for another.
And I am supposed to be okay with massive dragnet surveillance because they will stop at "National Security?"
Not like they've had a great track record keeping to their mandate.