Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

grantcart

(53,061 posts)
33. And what about the Journal for the AMA
Wed Jul 10, 2013, 10:15 AM
Jul 2013

Here is a peer review article about a study that indicates that Acupuncture is effective with chronic pain:

http://archinte.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleid=1357513



Background Although acupuncture is widely used for chronic pain, there remains considerable controversy as to its value. We aimed to determine the effect size of acupuncture for 4 chronic pain conditions: back and neck pain, osteoarthritis, chronic headache, and shoulder pain.

Methods We conducted a systematic review to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of acupuncture for chronic pain in which allocation concealment was determined unambiguously to be adequate. Individual patient data meta-analyses were conducted using data from 29 of 31 eligible RCTs, with a total of 17 922 patients analyzed.

Results In the primary analysis, including all eligible RCTs, acupuncture was superior to both sham and no-acupuncture control for each pain condition (P < .001 for all comparisons). After exclusion of an outlying set of RCTs that strongly favored acupuncture, the effect sizes were similar across pain conditions. Patients receiving acupuncture had less pain, with scores that were 0.23 (95% CI, 0.13-0.33), 0.16 (95% CI, 0.07-0.25), and 0.15 (95% CI, 0.07-0.24) SDs lower than sham controls for back and neck pain, osteoarthritis, and chronic headache, respectively; the effect sizes in comparison to no-acupuncture controls were 0.55 (95% CI, 0.51-0.58), 0.57 (95% CI, 0.50-0.64), and 0.42 (95% CI, 0.37-0.46) SDs. These results were robust to a variety of sensitivity analyses, including those related to publication bias.

Conclusions Acupuncture is effective for the treatment of chronic pain and is therefore a reasonable referral option. Significant differences between true and sham acupuncture indicate that acupuncture is more than a placebo. However, these differences are relatively modest, suggesting that factors in addition to the specific effects of needling are important contributors to the therapeutic effects of acupuncture.



So is Science a process of peer review double blind studies or simply "whatever Sid thinks?"
I find it difficult to believe that an accupunture needle could pierce the lung NV Whino Jul 2013 #1
That wasn't the finding of the Ontario Court... SidDithers Jul 2013 #3
The needles are 2" long NV Whino Jul 2013 #18
Watch this video, (Warning, not for the weak stomach types) snooper2 Jul 2013 #20
This is why most states regulate to those physicians (and veterinarians) who go on to receive hlthe2b Jul 2013 #2
So what's the science that tells an accupuncturist... SidDithers Jul 2013 #5
I won't be insulted, Sid.. I indicated this person didn't know basic anatomy. hlthe2b Jul 2013 #8
I read a study that determined pscot Jul 2013 #4
Not really "random". Hell Hath No Fury Jul 2013 #15
I have no idea how it works but I know 4 people who quit smoking from acupuncture. JaneyVee Jul 2013 #6
and I know a guy who finally quit smoking after hypnosis SCantiGOP Jul 2013 #9
The cashectomy effect pscot Jul 2013 #13
I, my wife and 6 other friends quit after laser treatment kysrsoze Jul 2013 #31
lost track of how many times G_j Jul 2013 #7
True, but idiots still have the needles stuck in them so the cause continues. 1-Old-Man Jul 2013 #12
one story G_j Jul 2013 #16
That massage therapist had - Hell Hath No Fury Jul 2013 #10
The Science-Based Medicine Blog is a great resource as well. longship Jul 2013 #11
Yup... SidDithers Jul 2013 #14
And yet your story is about a massage threapist practicing medicine illegally, or it would be here Bluenorthwest Jul 2013 #17
Thanks for the link. Iggo Jul 2013 #30
The Nationl Institutes of Health (NIH) concludes differently: hlthe2b Jul 2013 #19
Well NCCAM concludes differently... SidDithers Jul 2013 #23
NCCAM is one of the Insitutes of NIH... Educate yourself, SID, please hlthe2b Jul 2013 #26
And what about the Journal for the AMA grantcart Jul 2013 #33
I have type II CRPS cali Jul 2013 #34
The most important sentence zipplewrath Jul 2013 #35
I am a very satisfied person using acupuncture on several occasions and would continue with the Thinkingabout Jul 2013 #21
Acupuncture helped my brain and energy flow. ananda Jul 2013 #22
You might fool people but it does not work that way with little pups. Thinkingabout Jul 2013 #24
I get acupuncture because it was recommened to me by a friend who is not just an MD Bluenorthwest Jul 2013 #27
Problem is that requirements are not adequate for MTs to do acupuncture. Malpractice is bad, but uppityperson Jul 2013 #25
My wife is a Tradition Chinese Medicine practitioner agent46 Jul 2013 #28
It hasn't developed over the centuries. HuckleB Oct 2013 #38
Thanks for this link agent46 Oct 2013 #39
I gripe about homeopathy I see in drugstores, Sid, you gripe about acupuncture. Archae Jul 2013 #29
None of them work. That's the bottom line. HuckleB Oct 2013 #36
On the other hand acupuncture helped me lose 23 pounds LiberalEsto Jul 2013 #32
It's all a big placebo. HuckleB Oct 2013 #37
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Acupuncture: Small risks ...»Reply #33