Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: TRAYVON MARTIN IS NOT ON TRIAL [View all]yardwork
(69,954 posts)83. So does Zimmerman's violent history
Zimmerman's history of multiple assaults says a lot about the probability that he assaulted Martin without provocation.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
88 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
It shouldn't be. It's irrelevant as hell. Like bringing up the past sexual history of
Lex
Jul 2013
#4
If it is, then the prosecution should have introduced information on Zimmerman's past
sabrina 1
Jul 2013
#69
Then all the more reason to assume Zimmerman had his gun out when he confronted Martin. n/t
A Simple Game
Jul 2013
#21
So, Zimmerman was PSYCHIC, and knew that Martin had tried to buy a gun just by looking at him?
TrollBuster9090
Jul 2013
#41
is TM not afforded the right to defend himself against "Death or great bodily harm?"
frylock
Jul 2013
#42
He is too. Whoever wins is solid. Whoever can afford a gun to kill is the winner
NoOneMan
Jul 2013
#56
It's a window into how Zimmerman saw Trayvon, and how the law enforcement community saw him.
yardwork
Jul 2013
#66
ZM attacked a Policeman ,molested a woman, and beat up an ex GF? Why aren't they discussing that?
HipChick
Jul 2013
#11
To me, Zimmerman's history is highly relevant because it indicates a pattern of violent behavior.
yardwork
Jul 2013
#67
Can the prosecution now bring in Z's past as a defense rebuttal? The defence opened the door to
Maraya1969
Jul 2013
#86
Wouldn't it be weird if the judge prohibited discussion about Trayvon Martin?
Blue Bike
Jul 2013
#18
Sure, but this stuff has nothing to do with either his actions or his state of mind.
reusrename
Jul 2013
#52
Yes, the fact that the defense even came up with such a smarmy question of whether
lumpy
Jul 2013
#40
By bringing in details of Martin's character/background is the defense trying to prove that
lumpy
Jul 2013
#47
Thx. I don't usually watch it, but it was on at the gym...and I agree with you.
tofuandbeer
Jul 2013
#73
No kidding. I wonder if he'd SUCCEEDED in buying a gun, and ended up shooting Zimmerman
TrollBuster9090
Jul 2013
#38
Frankly, I'm far less worried about Zimmerman getting a reduced sentence, plead down to Manslaughter
TrollBuster9090
Jul 2013
#45
If he was going to 'plead down' to manslaughter, it would've already happened, long ago ...
brett_jv
Jul 2013
#74
Most of us believe that if Martin's private life is exposed in this court then it should be allowed
lumpy
Jul 2013
#49
Sounds like the defense is getting desparate. This new tactic is purely the defense trying to
lumpy
Jul 2013
#54
They want to jury to think that even if he didn't cause his death, he was "purgeable"
NoOneMan
Jul 2013
#55