Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Lydia Leftcoast

(48,223 posts)
9. After 9/11, a lot of people would have voted "yes"--I have a better idea
Fri Feb 17, 2012, 11:49 AM
Feb 2012

Here's my amendment:

1. No American military troops may be deployed overseas nor may any military attack be launched upon a foreign country from within the borders of the United States without a 2/3 vote of both houses of Congress.
("What about a surprise attack by a foreign power?" you ask. Note that Congress managed to meet after Pearl Harbor and pass a formal declaration of war, and this was during a time of much less developed communications and transportation. Even if the attack occurred during a recess, no Congresscritter is so far away from Washington that he or she couldn't come back for an emergency session in 24 hours.)
2.Such a declaration of war shall automatically trigger a nationwide draft of male and female citizens between the ages of 18 and 25, starting with the first and second-degree relatives of the president, the White House staff, the Cabinet, and the members of Congress.
(During World War II, President Roosevelt and most members of Congress had close relatives in the armed forces. During the Iraq War, only one Congressman did. If the Congresscritters do not think a war is important enough for their own children and grandchildren, nieces and nephews to fight, then it should not be fought. Would Bush have started the Iraq War if it had meant that Jenna and Barbara would be headed for boot camp?)

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

3. Chicken hawks are excluded from voting think Feb 2012 #1
Point 2 covers that hobbit709 Feb 2012 #2
Childish... JSnuffy Feb 2012 #3
Maybe we shouldn't ATTACK other countries. hobbit709 Feb 2012 #4
So... JSnuffy Feb 2012 #5
Let's hear yours. hobbit709 Feb 2012 #7
No kidding - but never mind scenarios... JackRiddler Feb 2012 #14
The real United States loses every conflict it engages in. JackRiddler Feb 2012 #6
Exactly Lydia Leftcoast Feb 2012 #8
After 9/11, a lot of people would have voted "yes"--I have a better idea Lydia Leftcoast Feb 2012 #9
Excellent. redqueen Feb 2012 #10
Your first point is good. former9thward Feb 2012 #15
The problem is that America has been using its military to forward its imperialst interests baldguy Feb 2012 #11
Untitled rundontwalk Feb 2012 #12
You do understand the difference between ATTACK and DEFENSE? hobbit709 Feb 2012 #13
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»I propose the War Amendme...»Reply #9