Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Amerigo Vespucci

(30,885 posts)

8. That EXACT point is being made on MSNBC right now

Reply to spanone (Reply #1)

Fri Feb 17, 2012, 11:04 AM

Feb 2012

"Friess is not only a backer, he's Santorum's BIGGEST backer." - Patricia Murphy, Newsweek & The Daily Beast.

Saying that neither Santorum nor Friess can "put this one back in the bottle."

Click here to purchase valentine hearts!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

12 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Charlie Rose DID NOT LET Santorum play the victim card over AspirinBetweenTheKnees-Gate [View all] Amerigo Vespucci Feb 2012 OP

it proves santorum is not ready for primetime spanone Feb 2012 #1

Meaning major contributor to his SuperPac. So it is fair question to ask him about it. yellowcanine Feb 2012 #5

That EXACT point is being made on MSNBC right now Amerigo Vespucci Feb 2012 #8

Yeah, Obama didn't catch any heat for that whole Reverend Wright thing alcibiades_mystery Feb 2012 #2

In other words, dance all around and throw out accusations, but don't answer the question. Arkansas Granny Feb 2012 #3

Santorum chose to pick a fight with Charlie Rose? That isn't going to play well. yellowcanine Feb 2012 #4

Sick Rick: "WWWWAAAAAAHHHHHH!!11!" peace frog Feb 2012 #6

Pass the popcorn... backscatter712 Feb 2012 #7

nice analogy. mick063 Feb 2012 #9

What a whiney-ass cry baby... Surya Gayatri Feb 2012 #10

The new GOP Mantra: This Is What You Guys Do ScreamingMeemie Feb 2012 #11

Having sex for the purpose of procreation ONLY is definitely on the same level pacalo Feb 2012 #12