General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: On not ignoring some DU posters [View all]Honeycombe8
(37,648 posts)out misinformation, explaining the law (why GZ wasn't drug tested in FL), etc. I have seen responses to such posts over the top, reacting with disgusting words...unable to have a real discussion about legalities, with objectivity.
I work in the legal field, so maybe I get the legalities a little better than some. Plus, I'm a little less emotional than others. I don't get all up in a wad when someone disagrees with me...if it's not a personal attack.
Example: some posters are adamant GZ is guilty of murder, yet don't even know some of hte basic evidence in the case.
The posters who point out the evidence are not "defending" GZ. They're simply people who know some facts and are reporting on that, or are being more objective.
Personally, I don't see evidence of murder so far (but I admit I probably don't know ALL the evidence). But I can see evidence for the jury to come back with manslaughter. Is that a defense of GZ? I don't think so.